My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2004-2019
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2072
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505553
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2004-2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2020 2:16:35 PM
Creation date
8/13/2020 12:19:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2004-2019
RECORD_ID
PR0505553
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0006856
FACILITY_NAME
FRANKS FOOD MART
STREET_NUMBER
2072
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
94336
APN
22202001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2072 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY COMPLAINT ORDER NO. R5-2005-0530 - 5 - <br /> MR. <br /> 5 - <br /> MR. FRANK AND MRS. SHERRI GUINTA, AND MR. JAMES AND MRS. MARILYN RAMSEY <br /> GUINTA ENTERPRISES <br /> FRANKS ONE STOP <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> well head treatment on the impacted private water supply wells. Additionally, Regional Board and <br /> State Board staff time will be required to oversee work funded by the EAR Account. <br /> VIOLATIONS <br /> 21. To date, the Dischargers have not complied with the CAO. By failure to maintain and test the <br /> domestic wellhead treatment systems,the dischargers have created a Public Health Emergency for <br /> the domestic well users. State emergency funds are currently being expended to mitigate the effects <br /> of the Discharger's refusal to maintain and test the domestic wellhead treatment systems. <br /> Additionally, not all CAO-required reports have been submitted. <br /> 22. The Dischargers have failed to: <br /> • Conduct the continuous maintenance of wellhead treatment systems and submit reports for <br /> sampling required for domestic water wells impacted by the groundwater plumes, since <br /> 31 January 2005. <br /> • Submit three quarterly monitoring reports (due 1 May 2005, 1 August 2005, and <br /> 1 November 2005). <br /> • Submit the Additional Site Characterization Report providing information from the approved <br /> Workplan, to assess the vertical and lateral extent of petroleum hydrocarbons, including <br /> Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MtBE) and 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA)pollution emanating <br /> from Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) removed from the site (due 1 February 2004). <br /> • Submit a Corrective Action Plan (CAP, due 1 April 2004). <br /> 23. The Dischargers failed to comply with the requirements of their deadline extensions and have <br /> benefited financially from the delays. Each time an extension was requested, Regional Board staff <br /> met with the Dischargers and emphasized the potential for penalties that would be calculated back to <br /> the original dates required under CAO No. R5-2003-0173. Additionally, all letters granting <br /> extensions from the Regional Board reiterated the potential for penalties for each incidence of non- <br /> compliance, including daily amounts per violation under California Water Code Section (CWC) <br /> 13350, calculated from the original dates due as specified in CAO No. R5-2003-0713. At each of <br /> the three meetings on 12 March 2004, 26 July 2004, and 3 December 2004 respectively, the <br /> Dischargers indicated that they had read CAO No. R5-2003-0713 and understood the meaning of <br /> penalties for failure to complete the Tasks required under CAO No. R5-2003-0713. <br /> 24. On 16 November 2004, Regional Board staff issued a Notice of Violation(NOV) for failure to meet <br /> the last extension, and requested a meeting by 3 December 2004. During that meeting, Regional <br /> Board staff again stressed that the consequences of failure to comply with the CAO No. <br /> R5-2003-0713 might include penalties. Subsequently, during the meeting, the Dischargers agreed to <br /> comply with the CAO. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.