Laserfiche WebLink
n <br /> s <br /> Since the information requested in Table 1 is for the entire facility, Table 1 is only completed <br /> once for each site. If your company has more than one site, and the processes and generated <br /> wastes are similar at each location,you may list the sites' individual USEPA or DTSC identi- rD <br /> fication numbers on Table 1 and consolidate the waste stream types and quantities from site <br /> to site on Table 2. This will allow for a "multi-site" document instead of preparing individual �O <br /> SPRs for each location. Table 2, Section 24 addresses accomplishments by specific waste O <br /> stream, as achieved over the last four year period 2006-2010. This information can be ob- <br /> tained from your 2010 Performance Report. Table 2, Section 25 addresses projections by <br /> specific waste stream covering the next four year period 2011-2014. Use your 2010 Plan to <br /> obtain information for Section 25. Since the information required for Table 2 is waste stream- 'S <br /> specific, a separate Table 2 must be completed for each major waste stream and for each r <br /> minor waste stream for which a source reduction measure was selected. <br /> O <br /> Note that SPR Form 1262 is also to be used to report extremely hazardous waste. If you have r* <br /> identified extremely hazardous waste in your 2006 or 2010 source reduction documents, <br /> please complete a separate copy of Form 1262 for your extremely hazardous waste streams <br /> and indicate their description in Table 2, Section 21. <br /> Also note that the SPR is not confidential and OPPGT will make all SPR forms available <br /> to the public upon request. If a trade secret issue is involved, follow the procedure dis- <br /> cussed in Chapter 8 of the Guidance Manual. <br /> 7.5 Solutions to Common SPR Mistakes <br /> September 1, 1999 was the first time that generators subject to SB 14 were required to pre- <br /> pare and submit an SPR to DTSC. Following that deadline, OPPGT evaluated all submitted <br /> SPRs for accuracy and completeness. The most common mistakes were: <br /> 1. Differentiating hazardous waste streams that are pretreated on site, and then <br /> discharged, from those that are not. Hazardous waste streams that are <br /> pretreated on site, then subsequently discharged via the sewer system to <br /> a publicly owned treatment works or to a receiving water under a National <br /> Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, are now <br /> referred to as Category A wastes in the Guidance Manual. This type of waste <br /> stream was formerly called "aqueous waste." All other hazardous waste streams <br /> subject to SB 14, which were formerly called ttnonaqueous wastes," are now <br /> referred to as Category B wastes. These terminology changes are relevant to <br /> Sections 15, 16, and 23 of SPR Form 1262. <br /> 2. Estimating source reduction achieved (i.e., the amount of waste reduced due to <br /> implementing source reduction). <br /> The last item in Table 2, Section 24 of the revised SPR Form asks the generator to estimate <br /> the quantity of waste reduced annually as a result of implementing a source reduction <br /> procedure. No single method of estimating this value is appropriate for all facilities or all <br /> waste streams. In Chapter 6 of the Guidance Manual (2010 edition), there is a page titled <br /> "Quantify Source Reduction Achieved," which provides examples that a generator might con- <br /> sider using to estimate their annual waste reduction, in pounds per year, due to implement- <br /> ing one or more source reduction measures on a specific waste stream. <br /> 59 <br />