My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0082168
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KLO
>
228
>
4200 – Liquid Waste Program
>
SR0082168
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2024 1:32:50 PM
Creation date
9/1/2020 4:03:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4200 – Liquid Waste Program
RECORD_ID
SR0082168
PE
4201 - LIQUID WASTE PLAN CHECK
STREET_NUMBER
228
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
KLO
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19124018
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
228 W KLO LATHROP 95330
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pressure manifold design <br />A SWIS consisting of 12 trenches of equal length is to be constructed on a slope. To divide the septic tank <br />effluent equally among the 12 trenches, a pressure manifold is to be used. The lateral taps are to be spaced 6 <br />inches apart on one side of the manifold. <br />Table 4-7 can be used to size the manifold. Looking down the series of columns under the Single -sided manifold, <br />up to sixteen 1/2 -inch taps could be made to a 4 -inch manifold. Therefore, a 4 -inch manifold would be acceptable. If <br />3/4- or 1 -inch taps were used, a 6 -inch manifold would be necessary. <br />Using the orifice equation, the flow from each lateral tap can be estimated by assuming an operating pressure in <br />the manifold: <br />Q = Ca(2gh)2 <br />where Q is the lateral discharge rate, C is a dimensionless coefficient that varies with the characteristics of the <br />orifice (0.6 for a sharp -edged orifice), a is the area of the orifice, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the <br />operating pressure within the manifold. In English units using a 0.6 orifice coefficient, this equation becomes <br />Q =11.79 dzhdvz <br />where Q is the discharge rate in gallons per minute, d is the orifice diameter in inches, and h is the operating <br />pressure in feet of water. <br />Assuming 1/2 -inch taps with a operating pressure of 3 feet of water, the discharge rate from each outlet is <br />Q= 11.79('/2)23'12=5.1 gpm <br />Thus, the pump must be capable of delivering 12 x 5.1 gpm or approximately 60 gpm against an operating <br />pressure of 3 feet of water plus the static lift and friction losses incurred in the forcemain to the pressure <br />manifold. <br />wastewater from each orifice in the network when <br />fully pressurized. This is accomplished by main- <br />taining a uniform pressure throughout the network <br />during dosing. The manifolds and laterals are sized <br />relative to the selected orifice size and spacing to <br />achieve uniform pressure. A manual flushing <br />mechanism should be included to enable periodic <br />flushing of slimes and other solids that accumulate <br />in the laterals. <br />Figure 4-16. Rigid pipe pressure distribution networks with flushing <br />cleanouts <br />Small Diameter <br />Pressure Distribution <br />Pumping (Dosing) <br />Septic Tank Chamber <br />Cleanout <br />Effluent <br />Pump <br />Design of dosed flow systems <br />A simplified method of network design has been <br />developed (Otis, 1982). Lateral and manifold <br />sizing is determined using a series of graphs and <br />tables ager the designer has selected the desired <br />orifice size and spacing and the distal pressure in <br />the network (typically I to 2 feet of head). These <br />graphs and tables were derived by calculating the <br />change in flow and pressure at each orifice between <br />the distal and proximal ends of the network. The <br />method is meant to result in discharge rates from <br />the first and last orifices that differ by no more <br />than 10 percent in any lateral and 15 percent across <br />the entire network. However, subsequent testing of <br />field installations indicated that the design model <br />overestimates the maximum lateral length by as <br />much as 25 percent (Converse and Otis, 1982). <br />Therefore, if the graphs and tables are used, the <br />maximum lateral length for any given orifice size <br />and spacing should not exceed 80 percent of the <br />maximum design length suggested by the lateral <br />sizing graphs. In lieu of using the graphs and <br />tables, a spreadsheet could be written using the <br />equations presented and adjusting the orifice <br />discharge coefficient. <br />4-26 USEPA Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.