Laserfiche WebLink
California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Central Valley Region (a <br /> Robert Schneider Chair <br /> Alan C.Lloyd Ph.D. Arnold Schwarzenegger <br /> Agency Secretary Sacramento Main Office Governor <br /> Intemet Address: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/ <br /> 11020 Sun Center Drive,#200,Rancho Cordova,CA 95670-6114 Mo u u Sclaya <br /> Phone(916)464-3291 •FAX(916)464-4780 u U <br /> SEP - g 2005 <br /> 6 September 2005 ENVIROMMENT HEALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> Nick Sikeotis <br /> Jessie's Grove Winery <br /> 1973 W. Turner Road <br /> Lodi, CA 95242 <br /> SECOND NOTICE OF VIOLATION,RESPONSE TO RWQCB's 6APRIL 2005 NOTICE OF <br /> VIOLATION, JESSIE'S GROVE WINERY, SAN JOA QUIN COUNTY <br /> Staff has reviewed the 12 April 2005 Response to RWQCB Correspondence Dated Apr. 6 2005 <br /> (Response)prepared by Neil O. Anderson and Associates (NOA) and determined that some of the <br /> replies to the Regional Board's 6 April 2005 Notice of Violation (NOV) are inadequate. Furthermore, <br /> the Regional Board never received the Response document until Ms. Abby Racco of NOA transmitted it <br /> via facsimile on 19 August 2005. It should be noted that staff has spent an unusually high number of <br /> hours responding to NOA's incomplete or inadequate submittals and the Response continues the trend. <br /> Failure to submit complete technical reports may result in imposition of an Administrative Civil <br /> Liability Complaint(ACLC). <br /> Staff has the following comments on the Response: <br /> • The Response ignores many of the comments provided by staff in the 6 April 2005 Notice of <br /> Violation. Those comments are repeated at the end of this letter in the section titled, "Remaining <br /> Issues." <br /> • The Response indicates no monitoring wells are proposed for the stormwater pond and that the <br /> wastewater system has been upgraded to prevent stormwater/wastewater mixtures from entering <br /> the stormwater pond. Staff has reviewed the (revised) 5 May 2005 O&M Plan sections that <br /> address stormwater issues and determined the improvements are unlikely to prevent <br /> stormwater/wastewater discharges to the stormwater pond. For example, Section 3.5 of the <br /> O&M Plan states: <br /> If the spray irrigation system is operational, it should be capable of processing all <br /> stormwater that enters the system. <br /> Such statements do not provide a realistic approach to handling the stormwater/wastewater issues <br /> at the site. If winds exceed 30 miles per hour (not an uncommon event during Northern <br /> California storms) then spray application may be prohibited. Land Application Requirement D.7, <br /> states: <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> 0 Recycled Paper <br />