My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1996-2026
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
12001
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0507825
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1996-2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2026 3:13:56 PM
Creation date
9/23/2020 2:07:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1996-2026
RECORD_ID
PR0507825
PE
4442 - SW COMPOST SITE - QUARTERLY INSPECTION
FACILITY_ID
FA0003867
FACILITY_NAME
DELICATO VINEYARDS LLC
STREET_NUMBER
12001
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20405008
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\kblackwell
Supplemental fields
Site Address
12001 S STATE ROUTE 99 MANTECA 95336
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER R5-2013-0028 -20- <br /> DELICATO VINEYARDS, INC. <br /> DELICATO FAMILY VINEYARDS <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Background Downgradient Objective <br /> Effluent Groundwater Groundwater m /L <br /> TDS 1,442 169-777 1,663 450 4 to 1,500$ <br /> FDS 706 -- -- -- <br /> Nitrate as Nitrogen 1.4 6.8-32 1.0 106 <br /> TKN 5 32 1.2- 1.3 0.86 -- <br /> Sulfate 154 8.0-97 163 2507 <br /> Sodium -- 8.7-86 366 694 <br /> Chloride -- 2.4 -23 123 106 4-600$ <br /> Manganese 8 -- <0.005—0.009 0.0175 0.0507 <br /> Iron 8 -- <0.05 <0.05 0.300 7 <br /> Arsenic 8 -- 0.005—0.022 0.007 0.0106 <br /> Flow weighted average from 2002-2011. <br /> 2 Compiled from MW-4, MW-5, and MW-6 data collected from 2008-2012. <br /> 3 Compiled from MW-3; mean of data collected 2001-2012. <br /> 4 Lowest agricultural water quality goal. <br /> 5 Total Kjeldahl nitrogen. <br /> 6 Primary Maximum Contaminant Level. <br /> Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level. <br /> 8 Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level range. <br /> 9 Based on a single groundwater sampling event conducted in August 2012. <br /> a. Total Dissolved Solids. The average wastewater FDS and TDS <br /> concentrations are 706 and 1,442 mg/L, respectively. The average TDS <br /> concentrations in background monitoring wells MW-4, MW-5, and MW-6 show <br /> that background groundwater quality is spatially variable with respect to TDS <br /> and has likely been degraded by agricultural land use upgradient of the site. <br /> As noted in Finding 61, the 95% upper confidence limit on the mean <br /> background TDS concentration is 724 mg/L. TDS concentrations in <br /> monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3, which are downgradient of current LAAs, <br /> average 1,663 mg/L. Therefore, the previous and current discharge has <br /> caused exceedance of the least stringent potential water quality objective for <br /> protection of MUN beneficial uses, which is the short-term maximum <br /> secondary MCL of 1,500 mg/L. There is not sufficient information about local <br /> agricultural practices to interpret the narrative water quality objective for <br /> protection of AGR beneficial uses. Therefore, this Order requires that the <br /> Discharger submit the information required to make this determination. <br /> Based on the planned modifications to the wastewater management system <br /> and expanded LAAs that this Order requires, groundwater quality with respect <br /> to TDS is expected to improve over time, but it is not possible to predict the <br /> level of improvement that can achieved or when it might occur. Therefore, <br /> this Order sets a groundwater limitation for TDS that prohibits any statistically <br /> significant increase in groundwater TDS and includes a time schedule in the <br /> Provisions that requires the Discharger to complete the proposed <br /> improvements, and evaluate the effectiveness of salinity reduction measures <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.