Laserfiche WebLink
evidence of close correspondence between actual and pre- priate. However, even in such cases, the vertical recharge <br /> dieted values confirms the validity of this method for esti- from waste water and rainfall will tend to accumulate and <br /> mating the area-wide nitrate effects on ground water from remain in a layer at the water table, largely unaffected by <br /> on-site sewage disposal systems. lateral inflow. This is due to the slow vertical mixing that <br /> With respect to the upgradient group of wells for occurs in horizontal ground-water flow.Use of the methods <br /> Baywood-Los Osos, one would expect the nitrate-nitrogen in this paper will protect against nitrate-nitrogen concentra- <br /> concentration to be considerably less than that predicted by tions in such upper layers exceeding safe limits. <br /> equation (1), because these wells are not affected by the 2. The nitrate-nitrogen concentrations predicted by the <br /> majority of the development in the study area.This is borne methods of this paper are long-term values. First, the <br /> out by the results in Table 3 and Figure 7,which show that development of an area to its ultimate density and waste- <br /> the mean nitrate-nitrogen concentration in the upgradient water loading rates may take many years.Second,depend- <br /> wells is 43 percent of that observed in the downgradient ing upon the thickness and nature of the unsaturated zone, <br /> wells. the travel time of effluent to the water table could vary from <br /> days to years. Finally,where the vertical recharge of waste <br /> Discussion water and rainfall adds to ground water in deep aquifers <br /> having little lateral flow, deep mixing will be a long-term <br /> Factors to be considered when using the simplified process.Such deep mixing could be caused by deep pump- <br /> mass balance method presented in this paper include the ing wells,leakage to even deeper aquifers,and ground-water <br /> following: outflow. <br /> 1. The method incorporates only the vertical compo- 3. The predictive equations are intended to be used to <br /> nent of ground-water recharge,ignoring any dilution effects evaluate average,area-wide ground-water conditions.They <br /> of lateral ground-water inflow from upgradient areas.From do not yield results that can be applied to a single point,such <br /> a planning and regulatory perspective, this is an appro- as might be required for siting or protecting an individual <br /> priate, conservative(worst case)approach. One must con- well.This would entail a more detailed analysis of the areal <br /> Sider that the nitrate-nitrogen concentrations in ground- and vertical distribution of nitrate-nitrogen in the ground <br /> water inflow from upgradient areas may also increase over <br /> water. <br /> time in response to waste-water loading or other land use 4. The simplified methods here do not explicitly account <br /> activities in those areas, thus making unreliable any esti- for other identifiable sources of nitrate-nitrogen, such as <br /> mates of the degree of dilution due to lateral ground-water animal wastes and fertilizer applications. Livestock wastes <br /> inflow.In circumstances where lateral ground-water inflow contain very high levels of nitrogen which may be a signifi- <br /> is determined to be significant and can be assigned a reliable cant contributor to ground-water nitrate-nitrogen concen- <br /> constant long-term nitrate-nitrogen concentration,then the trations,depending upon livestock densities,soil conditions, <br /> use of a mass balance model which includes such a lateral and waste handling practices. Wastes produced by a single <br /> flow component, e.g., Wehrmann (1984), may be appro- horse,for example,contain twice as much nitrogen as that <br /> from a typical household. This potential source should be <br /> added to the mass balance analysis when considering areas <br /> where significant livestock populations exist or can be <br /> expected within the development area. <br /> Lawn fertilizers contribute much less nitrate-nitrogen <br /> 26 ne=+-o mg/L than do livestock. For typical residential subdivisions and <br /> ° rural communities,a reasonable assumption is that about 10 <br /> 1. E 20 ° o percent of the gross area is landscaped with turf that is <br /> ° y° "° c fertilized. The nitrogen fertilizer rate for well-kept lawns is <br /> Z Z Drinking +i A <br /> W o +6 wet., estimated by nurseries to be about 40 to 65 lbs per year per <br /> - Stenderds40- <br /> _ ¢ PM 9G mgtL d_°,26 acre of turf. Typically, 50 to 75 percent of the applied <br /> z to ----- - ------nw- ------ nitrogen can be expected to be consumed by plant uptake <br /> y and soil denitrification(WPCF, 1990). The resultant load- <br /> 6 o ing to ground water is then approximately in the range of 1 <br /> to 3 lbs per year per developed acre.For an assumed rainfall <br /> 0 recharge rate of 12 inches/year, the resultant nitrate- <br /> 0 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.e0 1.00 nigrogen concentration from the leaching of fertilizer would <br /> WASTEWATER RECHARGE RELATIVE To be about 0.37 to 1.1 mg/1. In the simplified methods of this <br /> RAINFALL RECHARGE. UR paper,this is considered to be substantially accounted for in <br /> O Boline.Mess,North Study She T Chico Are& the assumption of a background nitrate-nitrogen Concentra- <br /> 0 Solkue Mese,South Study She ♦B.ywoodlLos 0800, tion of 0.5 to 1.0 mg/1.Where substantial portions of the site <br /> 0 Boma.Mess,Are.-Wide Downgredlent <br /> o BoywoodiLo.osos. <br /> 13 Commoare devoted to turf,special accounting may need to be made <br /> Predicn Values ted zone for Most Upgrsdent for fertilizer nitrate-nitrogen contributions. Mass balance <br /> Fig. 7. Comparison of actual and predicted nitrate-nitrogen models by Tinker(199 1)and the Center for Environmental <br /> oncentrations in ground water. Research(1985)incorporate a turf fertilizer component. <br /> 497 <br />