Laserfiche WebLink
No contribution from any irrigation or soil amendment is considered for the <br /> Hantzsche/Finnemore method. It is reasonably assumed that any irrigation or soil <br /> amendments would be applied at close to agronomic rates for a net balance of plant <br /> irrigation and nutrients. <br /> Percolating Recharge Waters <br /> One of the most determinant factors in the Hantzsche and Finnemore equation is the <br /> rate of recharge from percolating waters, which mix with the downward-percolating <br /> effluent generated by on-site septic systems. In the original Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> paper, "average recharge rate of rainfall" was utilized. <br /> Based on San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department policy (personal <br /> communication, March 18, 2019), the recharge input for the Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> equation should be derived from average monthly precipitation of rainfall and <br /> evapotranspiration rates for the area; the data should be obtained from the California <br /> Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS). Recharge is calculated by first <br /> determining whether the average monthly precipitation exceeds average monthly <br /> potential evapotranspiration. If so, then the difference is the percolating recharge water <br /> into the aquifer. Runoff and stream infiltration drainage are not factored into the <br /> calculation. This approach likely under-estimates recharge to the aquifer and, <br /> consequently, over-estimates nitrate loading. <br /> The Site is located closest to the CIMIS station at Staten Island (station 242). Data for <br /> the Staten Island station were available for the past four years; based on the calculation <br /> shown, the estimated rate of recharge from percolating waters for the Staten Island <br /> station is determined to be 11.78 inches (Plate 10). A statistical error of 45 percent is <br /> associated with this value. <br /> Quality of Rainwater <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore listed 1 mg/L-N as the nitrate concentration of rainwater for <br /> their original calculation; in the past, Live Oak has also utilized this value for the nitrate <br /> loading calculation. <br /> In May 2019, Live Oak collected rainwater during two storm events in Lodi; in March <br /> and May 2020, Live Oak collected two additional samples at the same location. Each <br /> sample was collected in a clean, dry, stainless steel bowl, then decanted into a plastic <br /> container and placed on ice for transport. The samples were analyzed for nitrate by <br /> FGL Environmental of Stockton. <br /> Nitrate was detected in the May 17, 2019 sample at a concentration of 0.4 mg/L-N, in <br /> the May 19, 2019 sample at a concentration of 0.2 mg/L-N, in the March 16, 2020 <br /> sample at a concentration of 0.2 mg/L, and in the May 18, 2020 sample at a <br /> LOGE 20-32 Page 6 <br />