My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0082985_SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SCHULTE
>
14800
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0082985_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:04:15 AM
Creation date
12/21/2020 3:02:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0082985
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
14800
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SCHULTE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20924023
ENTERED_DATE
12/8/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
14800 W SCHULTE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 – Executive Summary <br />Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2021 <br />14800 W. Schulte Road Logistics Center 1-18 <br />Section 15123(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR identify issues to be resolved; this includes <br />the choice among alternatives and whether or how to mitigate significant impacts and an increase in vehicle <br />miles traveled. <br />1.8 Alternatives to the Project <br />Section 15126.6(a) of the CEQA Guidelines states that an EIR shall describe “a range of reasonable alternatives to <br />the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project <br />but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project,” as well as provide an evaluation <br />of “the comparative merits of the alternatives.” Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(a), an EIR does not need <br />to consider alternatives that are not feasible, nor does it need to address every conceivable alternative to the <br />project. The range of alternatives “is governed by the ‘rule of reason’ that requires the EIR to set forth only those <br />alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice” (14 CCR 15126.6[f]). <br />No Project/No Development Alternative (Alternative 1) <br />Under Alternative 1, construction of the Project would not occur. The Project site would remain unchanged, and <br />development activities related to construction and operation of the proposed industrial/warehouse buildings, <br />associated office spaces, surface parking and loading areas, and all other proposed on- and off-site improvements <br />would not occur. <br />In the short term, consistent with the existing conditions, the Project site would continue to be undeveloped. Under <br />Alternative 1, the Project site would remain vacant, undeveloped land. <br />No Project/Other Development Alternative (Alternative 2) <br />Under Alternative 2, the Project site would be redeveloped with other land uses, consistent with the underlying <br />industrial designations and zoning. According to the County’s General Plan, the General Industrial Zone is typically <br />intended for uses such as manufacturing, distribution, storage, and wholesaling. <br />It is assumed that Alternative 2 would involve development of a land use that would be permissible either by right <br />or by site approval, special purpose plan, improvement plan, or use permit, including the aforementioned land uses <br />listed above. It is also assumed that those uses would share a similar development intensity/floor-area-ratio/site <br />coverage as the Project. <br />As previously described, the underlying General Industrial (I-G) Zone provides for a full range of industrial uses and <br />similar activities. Uses under Alternative 2 could include agricultural sales, auction yards, automotive rentals and <br />repair, light and heavy construction services, manufacturing, heavy equipment sales and repair, heavy and <br />hazardous materials industrial, recycling services, truck sales and repair, vehicle storage, and utility services. Given <br />that the Project buildings are intended be used for light warehousing and distribution uses as defined by the County <br />of San Joaquin Ordinance Code (Section 9-115.585), which is most commonly warehouse and distribution <br />operations, Alternative 2 could include substantially more intensive industrial uses compared to the Project (such <br />as the previous energy facility located at the site).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.