Laserfiche WebLink
J Page 2 of 2 <br /> From: Aris Cacapit [EH] mailto:acacapit s'cehd.cQm] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 3:27 PM <br /> To: Ahmad Ghaderi <br /> Cc: Yasmin Tabatabayi; Robert Velasco <br /> Subject: RE: Lockeford <br /> Good Afternoon Ahmad, <br /> According to site plan TK4-2 the electrical conduit is entering the dispenser from below and is not contained by <br /> the under dispenser contain ment(UDC). Our concern is that any leaks from the dispenser above is contained by <br /> the UDC below. There are two conversion frames that I know of approved by the State of California to address <br /> this type of issue. See the following links. The fourth link is an example of what I would need submitted to me as <br /> documentation of the conversion frame being ordered for this project. Another option you may want to consider <br /> is having the electrical penetration come in through the side of the dispenser and have a UDC underneath <br /> the dispenser that would contain any leaks from the dispenser. <br /> http//www msternfg com/pdfs/ConlainmentFrameAp_proval pdf <br /> http:dsbravo com/wp-content/themes/bravo/datasheets/CONV-82000-4-10-08 pdf <br /> http://sbravo.com/dispenser-conversions/conv-b2000/ <br /> httr)://www,sbravo.com/docs/CONVFRM OrderForm DispenserSiteSurvey.pdf <br /> Thank you, <br /> Ads Cacapit, REHS <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 E. Hazelton Rd. <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> desk 209 468-3453 <br /> fax 209 468-3433 <br /> email acacapit a s'cehd.com <br /> Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7121 <br /> (20120508) <br /> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. <br /> http://www.eset.com <br /> 5/10/2012 <br />