CORRESPONDENCE_2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The email from the Water Board thanks Reynolds & Brown for the information and states that they looked the WDS up on the SWIS "website" and found the same thing and that although the landfill appears to be mostly glass and from the analyses seen there does not appear to be a water quality issue, it was noted that AGE did not really define the groundwater gradient at the waste [disposal] site. The water Board stated that if it is assumed to be similar to the diesel spill area, the groundwater samples collected would be at the up gradient and side gradient "edge" of the waste. The Water Board stated that they would like a down gradient sample near the waste area. They also indicated that they have other questions from their our file about the waste stream from Pilkington, chemicals used in their process, disposition of bag dust waste, a sump that DHS recommended removing, and others. And that they were going to compile a list of questions, and try to coordinate with CalRecycle and SJCEHD (LEA)to get all the issues on the table. deuce frrr Fds the The Reynolds & Brown email says that when they purchased the property, the seller, Pilkington NA, set up a hold back escrow account, giving them a fund to draw upon "to deal with removing this site from closed landfill status and recycle it for industrial development" and that the ability to draw funds expires on August 22. The email states that since our acquisition of the property in February, they have worked diligently to address and respond to the questions raised by the LEA. It was stated that they have completed "that scope and I believe that the LEA has forwarded the results of that investigation to the Regional Board and CalRecycle" and that based on the window to access these funds and additional testing requires some lead time, could a quick conference call be set up this week (15 minutes) with the Regional Board and CalRecycle to review the proposed scope of work? This CalRecycle email appears to be what was previously indicated in a June 8, 2015 email correspondence from the LEA to AGE and states that this is what CalRecycle recommended to the LEA for additional investigation requirements. Additional information related to this email stated that CalRecycle and the LEA are OK with the RWQCB as the Lead Oversight and that the primary goal of CalRecycle regulations is to ensure that the disposal site is defined and covered to prevent public contact and that grading, drainage and erosion control measures are implemented to protect the cover. It was further stated that LFG testing should be conducted to ensure that it will not impact building structures or adjacent properties. It was also Ninyo&Moore 1 500 E.Louise Avenue,Lathrop,San Joaquin County,California 1 104690095 1 August 11,2017 35