Laserfiche WebLink
5. The curves of Figures I and 2 show the strong <br />influence of the rainfall recharge component on the resul- <br />tant nitrate -nitrogen concentration. The application of the <br />methods presented in this paper and the reasonableness of <br />the results are, therefore, limited by the accuracy with which <br />the rainfall recharge fraction can be estimated or determined <br />by the user. For best results, the user should perform a <br />thorough water balance analysis using techniques such as <br />those developed by the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service <br />(1964) or Thornthwaite and Mather (1955), or other infor- <br />mation based on local studies. <br />Planning Applications <br />The nitrate assessment procedures outlined in this <br />paper may have a number of land use and environmental <br />planning applications. A principal advantage is the minimal <br />requirement for data. <br />Zoning and Subdivision Proposals <br />Preliminary evaluation of potential water quality <br />impacts is useful when broad land use planning decisions are <br />being made. Computation of A or use of Figure 2 can <br />provide an initial basis for determining appropriate develop- <br />ment densities to assure protection of areal ground -water <br />quality. <br />Residential subdivision proposals can be screened for <br />potential long-term nitrate impacts by applying equations <br />(1) and (2). The North Coast Regional Water Quality <br />Control Board of California and several local health <br />departments have adopted these procedures for this pur- <br />pose. An indication of no potentially excessive nitrate build- <br />up in ground water according to the analyses presented in <br />this paper would obviate the need for further study. In the <br />event that preliminary analyses indicate possible problems <br />(e.g., planned development density exceeds 1/A), further <br />analyses might be required to define the ground -water <br />system and potential effects more specifically. Also, mitiga- <br />tion measures and ground -water monitoring requirements <br />may be formulated based on the preliminary nitrate predic- <br />tions. Possible mitigation measures might include reducing <br />development and sewage loading densities, incorporating <br />nitrogen removal systems (Laak, 1982), or modifying the <br />disposal system locations or design (Harkin et al., 1979). <br />Buildout in Existing Unsewered Areas <br />Continued buildout of certain existing development <br />areas using on-site sewage disposal systems may pose signifi- <br />cant long-term ground -water nitrate concerns. In cases <br />where development density is approaching critical levels <br />predicted by equation (2), then further analysis of possible <br />localized problems and more complete study of the ground- <br />water system is warranted. Ground -water monitoring may <br />be used to verify the water quality concerns indicated by the <br />predictive equations. The preliminary analyses using equa- <br />tions (1) and (2) provide a rational basis for the design of <br />field monitoring programs. Specific mitigation measures, <br />including modified design standards, might be appropriate <br />for any additional development that would tend to aggra- <br />vate observed ground -water quality problems. <br />498 <br />Conclusions <br />The accumulation of nitrate in the upper saturated <br />zone is a cumulative effect of on-site sewage disposal prac- <br />tices which has not been addressed by standard siting and <br />design criteria. This paper presents a convenient method for <br />estimating long-term increases in ground -water nitrate - <br />nitrogen caused by on-site sewage disposal. The method is <br />useful to practicing engineers and regulatory agencies for <br />the general planning and evaluation of residential develop- <br />ments as well as for the site-specific design of on-site sewage <br />disposal systems. This is evidenced by their adoption in <br />parts of California. <br />The greatest potential for ground -water nitrate -nitrogen <br />problems arises in areas of low rainfall recharge and high <br />development density. The situation may be critical if local <br />ground waters are used for domestic water supply. Existing <br />communities and cluster developments using large, com- <br />mon septic tank disposal fields are also likely to be of <br />significant concern because of the high concentration of <br />waste -water disposal in a limited area. In newer develop- <br />ments, mandatory space requirements for roads, buildings, <br />open space, etc., will sometimes keep the overall intensity of <br />development and waste -water application below critical <br />levels. <br />Comparison of predicted values with actual field <br />sampling data for several case study locations in California <br />confirms that the methods provide reasonable first approx- <br />imations of nitrate -nitrogen effects in ground water from <br />septic tank disposal fields. The agreement between predicted <br />and observed values is sufficient to enable potential areas of <br />concern to be identified, thus making the method an effec- <br />tive planning tool. <br />A promising application of these nitrate assessment <br />procedures is for regulatory purposes. The limited data <br />requirements and straightforward computations make the <br />approach widely suitable for evaluation of zoning and land <br />use plans, subdivision proposals, and continued develop- <br />ment in unsewered areas. The need for mitigation measures, <br />long-term monitoring, or more detailed site investigations <br />can also be readily determined by use of these procedures. <br />Acknowledgments <br />This paper was developed from a study supported by <br />United States Environmental Protection Agency Grant No. <br />P0092 110 10 and by California North Coast Regional Water <br />Quality Control Board Contract No. 0-092-118-0. <br />References <br />Alexander, M. 1965. Nitrification. Soil Nitrogen. W. V. <br />Bartholomew and F. E. Clark, eds. American Society of <br />Agronomy, Inc., Madison, Wl. Agronomy Series, No. 10. <br />pp. 307-343. <br />Broadbent, F. E. and F. Clark. 1967. Denitrification. Soil Nitro- <br />gen. W. V. Bartholomew and F. E. Clark, eds. American <br />Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, Wl. Agronomy <br />Series, No. 10. pp. 344-359. <br />California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast <br />Region (CRWQCB). 1983. Los Osos/Baywood Park area <br />basin plan amendment. Staff Report. 75 pp. <br />California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast <br />