Laserfiche WebLink
Information Sheet IS-3 <br /> Reissued Waste Discharge Requirements General Order R5-2013-0122 <br /> Existing Milk Cow Dairies <br /> v. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Bd. (hereafter AGUA) (2012) 210 Cal.AppAth <br /> 1255.) <br /> Responding to the reversal, the Superior Court issued a Writ of Mandate that compels the <br /> Central Valley Water Board to, "[s]et aside the [2007 General Order] and reissue the permit only <br /> after application of, and compliance with, the State's anti-degradation policy ... as interpreted by <br /> the Court of Appeal in its opinion." The reissued Dairy General Order is intended to set aside <br /> and replace the 2007 General Order in compliance with the Superior Court's writ of mandate. <br /> When the Board issued the 2007 General Order, it also issued a companion Monitoring and <br /> Reporting Program (MRP) pursuant to Water Code section 13267. This MRP included <br /> monitoring, record-keeping, and reporting requirements that were applicable to all dairies <br /> regulated by the 2007 General Order. However, due to resource constraints, the dairy industry <br /> and the Central Valley Water Board acknowledged that it would be infeasible for all the dairies <br /> to immediately implement individual monitoring programs: the dairies lacked the financial <br /> resources to install multiple monitoring wells at each facility, there were not enough consultants <br /> available to develop groundwater monitoring programs and install multiple monitoring wells at <br /> each dairy facility, and the Central Valley Water Board lacked the staff to analyze thousands of <br /> individual groundwater monitoring reports. <br /> In order to efficiently assess the water quality impacts associated with various waste <br /> management practices employed at the dairies, the Central Valley Water Board proposed two <br /> parallel approaches to monitoring: 1) the dairies that elected to conduct their own monitoring <br /> could continue to do so under their individual monitoring programs, and 2) the dairies that would <br /> prefer to pool their resources could enroll in a RMP. After soliciting public comments on <br /> revisions to the MRP that would add an RMP option, the Board's Executive Officer issued the <br /> revised version of the MRP (the "Revised MRP") on 23 February 2011. <br /> Under the RMP approach, individual dairies have the option of joining together to collectively <br /> monitor different waste management practices in a variety of geologic settings in lieu of <br /> developing individual monitoring programs. The collective monitoring effort is being used to <br /> develop a suite of effective management practices, and substantially decreases the expense <br /> and unnecessary duplication of implementing individual monitoring programs. Dairies utilizing <br /> management practices that are found not to be protective of groundwater quality will be required <br /> to improve upon those management practices. In accordance with the terms of the Revised <br /> MRP, the Board's Executive Officer approved a Monitoring and Reporting Workplan for the <br /> Central Valley Dairy Representative Monitoring Program (CVDRMP), which is discussed in <br /> greater detail under the section entitled How Will the Board Evaluate the Effectiveness of <br /> Management Practices?, which is presented later on in this Information Sheet. <br /> DAIRIES REGULATED BY THE DAIRY GENERAL ORDER <br /> There were approximately 1,600 dairy operations that received regulatory coverage under the <br /> 2007 General Order. Since then, the number of dairy operations within the Central Valley <br /> Region has declined significantly, largely due to economic reasons. Since 2007, revenues from <br />