My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013917
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MURPHY
>
13773
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1800315
>
SU0013917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2021 1:18:23 PM
Creation date
3/4/2021 8:02:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013917
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1800315
STREET_NUMBER
13773
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MURPHY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320-
APN
20312011
ENTERED_DATE
2/10/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
13773 S MURPHY RD
RECEIVED_DATE
4/8/2021 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Information Sheet IS-10 <br /> Reissued Waste Discharge Requirements General Order R5-2013-0122 <br /> Existing Milk Cow Dairies <br /> (b)the highest water quality consistent with maximum benefit to the people of the State will be <br /> maintained. <br /> Generally speaking, these provisions <br /> State Anti-Degradation Policy Flowchart require that the Board adopt standards <br /> and requirements to ensure the <br /> 1.The Board uses the ROWD and its Best discharger controls the discharge by <br /> Professional Judgment(BPJ)to derive a list of The Initial Water <br /> Constituents of Concern(CDCs)in the QualitV Assessment employing "best practicable treatment or <br /> discharge that could degrade groundwater control" methodologies to limit the extent <br /> of the degradation, and that the Board <br /> carefully consider whether the permitted <br /> 2.The Board derives numeric limits or other degradation inheres to the maximum <br /> restrictions for the COCl that will protect the benefit to the people of the State when <br /> Beneficial Uses <br /> the Board prescribes waste discharge <br /> requirements that will result in the <br /> degradation of high-quality waters. The <br /> 3.The Board determines"baseline"receiving State Anti-Degradation Policy also <br /> water quality(the best quality that existed <br /> since 1968,minus any previously-authorized requires that the Board prohibit waste <br /> degradation) discharges from resulting in water <br /> pollution or nuisance, though this is a <br /> requirement that also exists outside the <br /> 4.Compare the baseline(Step text of the State Anti-Degradation <br /> 3)to the numeric limits(Step 2). Policy does not apply;the Board cong <br /> Is the receiving water a"High- must ensure that the Discharger Policy. (see Wat. Code, § 13263.) <br /> Quality"water? No utilizes"Best Efforts" <br /> Yes The State Water Board has provided <br /> only limited guidance regarding the State <br /> S.Review the ROWD and Anti-Degradation Policy. The State Water <br /> analyze the discharge.Will the Does the Po11CV <br /> discharge degrade the High- Board's Administrative Procedures <br /> Quality water? No Apply? <br /> Update 90-004 provides guidance for <br /> Yes implementing State Anti-Degradation <br /> Policy and the Clean Water Act's anti- <br /> 6.Will WDRs developed from <br /> the ROWD result in the"Best The Board must require the degradation provisions (40 C.F.R. § <br /> Practicable Treatment or Discharger to upgrade its waste <br /> Control"eTreat of the Treatment <br /> stes? No management practices 131.12.) in the context of NPDES <br /> permitting. Although APU 90-004 is not <br /> Yes directly applicable to the Dairy General <br /> 7.Is the degradation Order because nonpoint discharges from <br /> "Consistent with the Maximum The Board is prohibited from agriculture are exempt from N PDES <br /> Benefit to the People of the allowing the degradation to <br /> State"? No occur permitting requirements, the Appellate <br /> Court found this document informative in <br /> Yes interpreting the State Anti-Degradation <br /> If the Board prescribes WDRs, Policy. The following analysis adheres to <br /> 8.Will the discharge meet water either the WDRs or a separate existing guidance and the Appellate <br /> quality objectives? Order must include a time <br /> No schedule for Discharger to meet Courts decision in the AGUA case. <br /> water quality objectives <br /> Yes <br /> All elements of the Anti-Degradation <br /> Policy are met—the Policy:Application <br /> Board may prescribe <br /> WDRs <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.