Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Soil Investigations for Data Collection in the Delta <br />Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 84 <br />cycle is completed in the brackish and tidal freshwater reaches of the upper San <br />Francisco Estuary. In addition, a freshwater resident life history type was found <br />by Bush (2017), which primarily occurs in the Cache Slough region year-round <br />(Sommer et al. 2011). Salinity requirements vary by life stage. Apart from <br />spawning and egg-embryo development, the distribution and movements of all <br />life stages are influenced by transport processes associated with water flows in <br />the estuary, which also affect the quality and location of suitable open water <br />habitat (Dege and Brown 2004; Feyrer et al. 2007; Nobriga et al. 2008). Delta <br />Smelt are weakly anadromous and undergo a spawning migration from the low <br />salinity zone (LSZ; 1–6 parts per thousand [ppt]) to freshwater in most years <br />(Grimaldo et al. 2009; Sommer et al. 2011). Most of the later life-stage Delta <br />smelt captured during the FMWT were collected in the 1 to 5 ppt salinity zone <br />(Kimmerer et al. 2013). Spawning migrations occur between late December and <br />late February, typically during “first flush” periods when inflow and turbidity <br />increase on the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Grimaldo et al. 2009, <br />Sommer et al. 2011). Adult smelt do not spawn immediately after migration to <br />freshwater but appear to stage in upstream habitats (Sommer et al. 2011). <br />Spawning primarily occurs during April through mid-May (Moyle 2002). There are <br />a wide range of perspectives in the scientific literature regarding the extent to <br />which the spatial distribution of Delta Smelt co-varies with X2 with more recent <br />data and analyses suggesting factors other than X2 explain the distribution of the <br />species (Murphy and Hamilton 2013; Manly et al. 2015; Latour 2016; Polanksy et <br />al. 2018, Murphy and Weiland 2019). Dege and Brown (2004) found that larvae <br />less than 20 mm rear 3–12 miles (5–20 km) upstream of X2 (Dege and Brown <br />2004; Sommer and Mejia 2013). As larvae grow and water temperatures <br />increase in the Delta (~73°F [23 °C]), their distribution shifts towards the low <br />salinity zone (Dege and Brown 2004; Nobriga et al. 2008). By fall, the centroid of <br />Delta Smelt distribution is tightly coupled with X2 (Sommer et al. 2011; Sommer <br />and Mejia 2013). While salinity is generally seen as a key driver of Delta smelt <br />distribution, more recent research suggests other factors, such as water velocity <br />(Bever et al. 2016), may be an important predictor of Delta smelt presence. <br />Similarly, Murphy and Weiland (2019) demonstrate salinity alone may not be the <br />best predictor of Delta smelt abundance and distribution. <br />Overall, designated in-water work windows would reduce exposure of sensitive <br />fish species, including Delta smelt, and life stages to in-water work activities. The <br />activities of the Proposed Project would be minor in scope and would not result in <br />degradation of aquatic habitat or water quality conditions and any potential <br />effects related to potential increase in suspended sediment concentrations and <br />contaminants due to disturbance of the river bed would be negligible. <br />Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM BIO-14, along with MM HYD-1 and <br />MM HAZ-1 through 4 would reduce potential impacts to Delta Smelt to: Less than <br />Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. <br />Steelhead – Central Valley DPS (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus pop. 11)