Laserfiche WebLink
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS <br />SSS§ 6.2. To assess the permeability of the effluent receiving soils, two perc test depths of 36" <br />and 96" were drilled with a B-24 Mobile Drill Rig in the location of the proposed primary filter bed <br />as depicted on the APN Map. <br />SSS§ 6.3. After drilling, the sidewall of the shallow boring was scored with a pry-bar to open <br />potentially smeared soil surfaces. Two inches of pea gravel was placed at the bottom of both <br />borings and a three-inch perforated PVC pipe was inserted in each test boring. After these <br />procedures, the borings were pre-saturated with 12 inches of water approximately 24 hrs prior to the <br />start of testing. <br />SSS§ 6.4, 6.5. On November 26, 2019, percolation testing commenced at 0730 hrs. No standing <br />water was observed in either boring after the 24-hr soak period. Consequently, EHD Perc Test <br />Procedure #2 was conducted. Testing was done over a four-hour period to induce maximum soil <br />saturation. The test results indicate a relatively rapid perc rate of 13.9 min/in for the shallow boring <br />and 7.8 min/in for the deeper test boring. <br />A summary of the perc test results with corresponding application rates in gallons of effluent accepted <br />per square foot of soil per day are illustrated below in Table 2: <br />TABLE 2 <br />A PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS WITH CORRESPONDING SOIL TYPE, <br />PERCOLATION RATE AND APPLICATION RATE IN GALLONS / FT2 / DAY <br />36 INCH DEEP PERC TEST BORING 13.9 min/inch / 0.743 gallons/fe/day <br />96 INCH DEEP PERC TEST BORING 7.8 min/inch / 0.800 gallons/f 2 /day <br />GROUNDWATER INFORMATION <br />NLS§ 2.1, SSS§ 4.1. Groundwater depths and elevations throughout San Joaquin County are <br />illustrated on maps published by the County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. The <br />Fall 2015 and 2016 Lines of Equal Depth Maps and the Lines of Equal Elevation Maps indicate <br />groundwater depth and directional flow. Depth to groundwater is approximately 35-40 ft below <br />grade and the groundwater directional flow appears to be in a northeasterly direction. <br />NLS§ 2.2,3.1, SSS§ 4.2. Surrounding agricultural properties are currently farmed and have been <br />for decades, and surrounding properties have been on septic systems so the potential for nitrate <br />contamination of the underlying groundwater can be considered significant. <br />NLS§ 2.3, SSS§ 4.3, 4.4, 4.5. There is no well on, nor is a well proposed to be drilled the property. <br />A water sample was obtained from the city water line that will ultimately serve the property. Test <br />results show a nitrate-nitrogen concentration of 0.2 ppm. <br />Page -3- <br />Chesney Consulting