My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2001 - 2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
31130
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440003
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2001 - 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2024 2:40:53 PM
Creation date
3/29/2021 1:45:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2001 - 2006
RECORD_ID
PR0440003
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0003698
FACILITY_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
31130
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
31130 CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EHD/SWD 2/27/01 Meeting <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> Ponding on the Top Deck <br /> discussed. So <br /> The issue of grading the top deck was me repairs to the top deck were made this fall. The <br /> areas that were repaired were located on both the East and West sides of the main fill, near the drainage <br /> down spouts. The EHD site visits are made without a representative from the SWD, which might have <br /> ere may be confusion surroundin <br /> left this issue open to some speculation Landfill staff have been told t question. <br /> urvey the top deck at Harney Lane L dfill <br /> this issue. The North County <br /> after each rain event. The survey would include marking the areas of ponding and remove standing <br /> water. Once the areas are marked,they will be repaired during the dry season. <br /> Corral Hollow Landfill(SWIS Facility 39-AA-0005) <br /> Tracy Hills Project and Adjacent Structures: <br /> The discussion of this facility centered on the installation of the gas extraction system and the proposed <br /> new development located directly to the North of the landfill. The Tracy Hills Project is proposed to <br /> extend in an East—West direction along Corral Hollow Road. The EHD as well as the California <br /> Integrated Waste Management Board's concern is that the proposed structures will be located within <br /> 1,000 feet of the facility boundary and will need to be continuously monitored. The EHD stated that <br /> efforts would be made to accomplish this. <br /> Lovelace Transfer Station(SWIS Facility 39-AA-0008) <br /> • Truck Wash Clarifier <br /> The site has been subject to subsurface discharge from the truck wash to the on-site sewage disposal <br /> system. The discharge was discovered during a complaint investigation. The EHD asked if the system <br /> was designed to discharge to the lift station for the sewage system. The SWD assured the EHD that the <br /> plans indicated that the clarifier was going to be connected to the lift station for the on-site sewage <br /> system. The EHD requested a copy of the plans that indicated the two systems were to be connected. A <br /> discharge of waste oil to the ground is considered to be a hazardous waste violation. Pneumatic rubber <br /> plugs have been used to temporarily plug the lines to stop the discharge, <br /> but are not considered a <br /> permanent solution. The EHD requests that the plugs be inspected to verify they are in place and will <br /> incorporate this into the monthly inspection routine until the line is properly disconnected. The impact to <br /> the leach field is unknown at this time. However, an investigation will be required to determine the <br /> impact to the leach field. The proximity of groundwater is a concern and will need to be addressed as part <br /> of the investigation by a qualified environmental engineering firm. <br /> In closing, better communication will be necessary between the two agencies. The EHD suggested that <br /> the two agencies have quarterly meetings to discuss issues that may arise. The SWD suggested that a <br /> representative from the EHD attend the SWD's monthly site coordination meetings. The EHD agreed to <br /> attend the monthly coordination meetings to discuss current issues at each of the sites and to pass along <br /> new information concerning regulatory requirements. Communication between the two agencies could be <br /> increased by having the operator accompany the inspector on site visits and through increased inspection <br /> activity when issues are identified. The EHD reviewed the process that would be followed when issues <br /> arise. If an issue is not a threat to public health or the environment, it will be cited as an "Area of <br /> Concern" on the inspection form. If the issue is not resolved by the next inspection, it will become a <br /> violation. Sites that are subject to a quarterly inspection frequency will be inspected monthly when a <br /> violation is noted. If a site receives two consecutive violations, further enforcement will be pursued by <br /> he environment <br /> the EHD. Any condition that case shallsa risk to public health or a violation be allowed to existtover a period of one l be(1) object to <br /> immediate follow-up. In no (1)ye <br /> If you have any questions regarding this summary,please contact me at(209)468-0332. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.