My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2001 - 2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
31130
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440003
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2001 - 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2024 2:40:53 PM
Creation date
3/29/2021 1:45:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2001 - 2006
RECORD_ID
PR0440003
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0003698
FACILITY_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
31130
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
31130 CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring Report Compliance Checkl 3 <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A RWQCB <br /> Reviewer Comment <br /> WDRs/MRP/ Groundwater Monitoring X <br /> Standard <br /> Provisions 1. Are all groundwater Field <br /> (1993,199792000, Parameters Monitoring Parameter, <br /> 2003) and COCs(if required)sampled <br /> and analyzed? <br /> m. Have any groundwater X 2 NU Quarter: 7 VOCs in well MW-5, four <br /> concentration limits been with increasing trend;Nitrates in well MW-4; <br /> exceeded? If yes, identify in 3m Quarter: 9 VOCs in well MW-5,three <br /> comments. increasing trend. TDS and chloride also <br /> increasing in well MW-5 <br /> n. is there a description and X <br /> graphical presentation of <br /> groundwater flow direction and <br /> gradient? <br /> o. Monitoring Wells: is there a X Hydrograph of well MW-5 indicates screen <br /> description, method, and time of interval is improperly set below historical <br /> water level measurement and well DTW levels, specifically last six sampling <br /> recovery time? events. Field sheet of MW-5 has recorded <br /> drawdown equal to 0.62'. Staff are <br /> concerned MW-5 is not being purged enough <br /> to collect representative sample of formation <br /> water. <br /> p. Purging: Is there a description of X Standard SAP language. Field notes do not <br /> the purging method,purge pump describe observed drawdowns or recharge of <br /> and its placement,and field wells. Staff concerned formation water not <br /> parameters? being sampled in well MW-5. See comments <br /> below. <br /> WDRs Semiannual/Annual Monitoring <br /> Standard Report(when applicable) <br /> Provisions <br /> (1993,1997,2000, q. Are all monitoring parameters and <br /> 2003) COCs graphed so as to show <br /> historical trends at each <br /> Monitoring Point and Background <br /> Monitoring Point? <br /> r. Is all monitoring analytical data <br /> obtained in the last year presented <br /> in tabular form, as well as on a <br /> diskette or CD? <br /> s. Is there a comprehensive <br /> discussion of the compliance <br /> record and the result of any <br /> corrective actions? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.