Laserfiche WebLink
Monitoring Report Compliance Checklist 4 <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 , <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A RWQCB <br /> Reviewer Comment <br /> t. Is there a map showing the area X Closed Landfill <br /> and elevations in which filling has <br /> been completed during the past <br /> year and comparison to final <br /> closure contours? <br /> WDRs u. Is there a summary of the <br /> Standard monitoring results indicating any <br /> Provisions changes made or observed since <br /> (1993,1997,2000, the previous annual report? <br /> 2003) <br /> v. Is there an evaluation of the X <br /> effectiveness of the leachate <br /> monitoring/control facilities? <br /> Standard w. Is there a discussion about the X <br /> Provisions annual LCRS-testing and a <br /> -- <br /> (April 2000, comparison to earlier testing? <br /> Sept.2003)or <br /> check WDRs <br /> Violations Noted? (check one) Yes—X— No <br /> If Yes, check all issues that apply and provide comments: <br /> Comments (to be entered into CIWQS/Geotracker): <br /> Incomplete transmittal letter <br /> Incomplete report Groundwater continues to be affected by LFG. <br /> Inadequate monitoring program Statistical increases in bicarbonate TDS chloride <br /> New release sodium, and pH in well MW-5. Seven VOCs reported <br /> Inadequate response to evidence of a release in well MW-5, concentrations consistent with past <br /> WDRs violation other than listed above detections reported. Dichlorofluoromethane (Freon <br /> Other (explain in comments) .12) and Trichlorofluoromethane Freon 11) detected in <br /> well MW-5. Five VOCs detected in well MW-8 <br /> including Freon I 1 and 12. LFG collection has been <br /> increased but groundwater contamination persists. <br /> PCE was reported in both wells at concentrations that <br /> exceed the Public Health Goal of 0.06 µg/L. <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: <br /> Date: <br />