Laserfiche WebLink
Other mandates that would reduce GHG emissions include reducing per capita water <br /> consumption and imposing waste management standards to reduce methane and other <br /> GHGs from solid wastes. <br /> As discussed in Section 3.6, Energy, the project would be subject to codes that require <br /> energy efficiency measures, which would reduce the amount of electricity produced by <br /> fossil fuels — a major source of GHG emissions. Also, as discussed in Section 3.6, <br /> attainment of the targets of the Renewables Portfolio Standard would reduce the amount <br /> of electricity generated by fossil fuels, further reducing GHG emissions from energy <br /> sources. <br /> Based on the information provided above, the project would be consistent with GHG <br /> reduction plans of the State and with the County General Plan policy on mitigation of <br /> GHG emissions. Project impacts related to consistency with GHG emission reduction <br /> plans would be less than significant. <br /> 3.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Would the project: Potentially with Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact <br /> a)Create a significant hazard to the public or the <br /> environment through the routine transport,use,or disposal <br /> of hazardous materials? <br /> b)Create a significant hazard to the public or the <br /> environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and <br /> accident conditions involving the release of hazardous <br /> materials into the environment? <br /> c)Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely <br /> hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one-quarter <br /> mile of an existing or proposed school? <br /> d)Be located on a site which is included on a list of <br /> hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government <br /> Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a <br /> significant hazard to the public or the environment? <br /> e)For a project located within an airport land use plan or, <br /> where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of <br /> a public airport or public-use airport,would the project result <br /> in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or <br /> working in the project area? <br /> f)Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an <br /> adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation <br /> plan? <br /> g)Expose people or structures,either directly or indirectly, <br /> to a significant risk of loss,injury or death involving <br /> wildland fires? <br /> Pock Lane Public Review Draft IS/MND 3-38 May 2022 <br />