Laserfiche WebLink
Consolidated Forward 1,146ndfill <br /> 1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> B.4CKGROUND 989. This <br /> public <br /> Assembly Bill 3180 became lay in California in i uahenthape <br /> pro -= subject to <br /> agencies to adopt monitoring or reporting pr-J V----ant impacts. <br /> d�,;,t2d�;hen a public agency ���its findings <br /> Environmental Impact Reports(EIRs) or \�rzti�-` Declaiations that identify s:= 'The reporting or monitoring program mus - made a <br /> under the California Environmental Quality act (CEQ A) so that the program c -- i <br /> �T rz ;;--ni_f-icant effects on the en,._-c hent. The <br /> condition of project approval in order to miti�a•- -,ro z`t im lementat _ mitigate or <br /> program must be designed to ensure ects mpliance ;- u` C r` 1 - p <br /> avoid significant environmentaleffects. <br /> — ared for <br /> as three previous ___ _nre P <br /> This NM MRP lists mitigation measures identified in:z L <br /> the project site. The three previous EIRs are: _ <br /> • _ �-,-+-•�ert Department,Fin- -'"�'-=omental <br /> 1. County of San Joaquin,Communis' D _•:�:_r I ' - , No. ER- <br /> 1. _� ermit Modifications. �---my <br /> Impact Report for the Forward,Inc.tams-'' ,c•=; entified as <br /> 92.4,SCH No. 92032013,prepared by LS- Assoc'-ales,Inc.,�`iarch �- -- <br /> "Forward 1993" below). <br /> .-���� Final Environmental jr-, -a -- <br /> Report: City <br /> 2. City of Stockton, Public Works Depaprepared <br /> of Stockton Austin Road Landfill Expans,on Prod dentifiied as 'Austin019 below). by <br /> Environmental Science Associates, June 99-� <br /> Community Development Department,Fine Supplemental <br /> 3.County of San Joaquin, <br /> vironmental Impact Report: Austin Road Landfill Expansion u rOJ�� identified as <br /> En <br /> 90020718,prepared by Grassetti Environmental Consulting, azY <br /> „Austin 2000"below). <br /> Of all required mitigation measures,and a table describing s <br /> This NBW includes both a complete listing torin shall <br /> is responsible for monitoring the implementation of those measures'and how that mani g <br /> whoi <br /> be implemented. <br /> se uentially. <br /> Mitigation measures are grouped by the impact categories used in this EIR,and num r % q <br /> This EIR•'.with the original Mitigation'�Seasure <br /> easures <br /> Mitigation Measures from this,EIR are printed to normal font,and identified as either IRs are <br /> Proposed as Part of the Project or"Identified Niirigation measures from the.three evtous E <br /> numbers from this EIR following in(parentheses). - <br /> �e relevant EIR. Because some impacts in this <br /> printed in italics and identified by their source(Forward 1993,Austin 1994,or Austin 2000,as defined <br /> above),followed by the Mitigation Measure number trom <br /> and previous FIRS do not require mitigation measure=•the original mitigation tL�=-rz numbers are <br /> EIR P <br /> not sequential. <br /> cases mitigation measures from rn'o or'=•'Or=°= t.-:previous EIRs that are _.�==-ntially similar <br /> In somet. -}` <br /> -�� o <br /> These <br /> in content,or have been updated without other'.-ise _ named,have been com - -�,m the three <br /> �;ed". Mitigation meas'. been <br /> mitigation measures are identified as "similar an. _ s in this EIR.or have a—zadY <br /> previous EIRs that have been <br /> excluded from.the <br /> by e ou`% <br /> implemented, ar <br />