My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2013
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
31130
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440003
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2021 2:42:28 PM
Creation date
4/21/2021 3:36:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2013
RECORD_ID
PR0440003
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0003698
FACILITY_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
31130
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
31130 CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cease and Desist Order R501 - 4 - <br /> San <br /> 4 -San Joaquin County Department of Public Works <br /> Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> 21. In December 2006, Central Valley Water Board staff senna Notice of Violation for <br /> the continued detection of VOCs in groundwater at monitoring well MW-5, and <br /> directed the County to conduct an evaluation monitoring program (EMP) to define <br /> the nature and extent of the release from the WMU. On 9 March 2007, Central <br /> Valley Water Board staff issued a second Notice of Violation letter for VOCs <br /> present in groundwater at monitoring well MW-5. <br /> 22. In March 2007, the County submitted an Evaluation Monitoring Program (EMP) <br /> work plan. In a letter dated 11 April 2007 Board staff approved the EMP. <br /> However, the County requested that it not be required to implement the EMP and <br /> instead install additional corrective action measures. The County stated that LFG <br /> was the cause of the continued groundwater impacts and that additional LFG <br /> extraction wells installed adjacent to the northeastern property boundary would <br /> remediate the impacts. <br /> 23. In November 2007, an EMP was conducted, consisting of exploring for the <br /> presence of shallow groundwater along the northern and southern boundaries of <br /> the landfill. The investigation encountered a shallow groundwater aquifer <br /> approximately 400 feet west of MW-5, and monitoring well MW-8 was installed at <br /> that location. No shallow groundwater was detected further west than MW-8. On <br /> the southern boundary of the landfill, the borings did not encounter shallow <br /> groundwater to the west of MW-4 and therefore, no monitoring wells were installed. <br /> 24. On 14 January 2008, VOCs were detected in monitoring well MW-8. The . <br /> compounds and concentrations detected indicate that the source of ground water <br /> contamination emanates from an area near MW-5, most likely from LFG not <br /> captured by the existing LFG system. <br /> 25. In December 2008, five new LFG extraction wells were installed for a total of 44 <br /> LFG extraction wells. The additional wells were placed to control LFG impacts to <br /> groundwater near MW-5. <br /> 26. Groundwater monitoring wells MW-5 and MW-8 continue to contain VOCs, <br /> including tetrachloroethene (PCE), at concentrations over the Public Health Goal of <br /> 0.06 pg/L and the Title 27 Water Quality Protection Standard of non-detect. VOCs <br /> have been detected in well MW-5 since 1991, and although the number of <br /> compounds reported has decreased since corrective action has been <br /> implemented, ten VOC compounds were reported in well MW-5 during the fourth <br /> quarter 2010 groundwater monitoring event. <br /> 27. The additional LFG extraction wells installed in 2008 to abate detected pollution in <br /> wells MW-5 and MW-8 have had little effect on groundwater impacts observed. In <br /> a letter dated June 2010, the County stated that the uncovered refuse identified <br /> outside the WMU is a likely contributor to groundwater degradation. <br /> 28. On 7 July 2011, the Executive Officer issued a Water Code Section 13267. <br /> Among other items, the Order required the County to submit an Evaluation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.