Laserfiche WebLink
Cease and Desist Order R5- 13-XXXX - 9 - <br /> San <br /> 9 -San Joaquin County Department of Public Works <br /> Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Any time the RWQCB determines that the corrective action program does not satisfy <br /> the requirements of this section, the discharger shall, within 90 days of receiving <br /> written notification of such determination by the RWQCB, submit an amended report of <br /> waste discharge to make appropriate changes to the program. <br /> g. Title 27, section 20400, which states in part: <br /> (a) ...For each Constituent of Concern—, the discharger shall propose one of the <br /> following...: <br /> (1) Background Value— a concentration limit not to exceed the background <br /> value of that constituent as determined pursuant to §2041 5(e)(1 0)(A); <br /> (2) Value Redetermined Each Time—that the WDRs include a statement that, <br /> at any given time, the concentration limit for that COC will be equal to the <br /> background value of that constituent, as determined pursuant to §20415(e)(1 0)(B); <br /> or <br /> (3) CLGB —a concentration limit greater than background (CLGB) established <br /> pursuant to this section for a corrective action program. <br /> (b) ... Upon final approval by the RWQCB, each concentration limit and each <br /> statement shall be specified in WDRs... <br /> (c) Establishing a CLGB— For a corrective action program, the RWQCB shall <br /> establish a CLGB... only if the RWQCB finds that it is technologically or economically <br /> infeasible to achieve the background value for that constituent and that the constituent <br /> will not pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the <br /> environment as long as the CLGB is not exceeded. In making this finding, the RWQCB <br /> shall consider the factors specified in %d), the results of the engineering feasibility <br /> study submitted pursuant to §20425(c), data submitted by the discharger pursuant to <br /> §20425(4)(2) to support the proposed CLGB, public testimony on the proposal, and <br /> any additional data obtained during the evaluation monitoring program. <br /> (d) CLGB Ceiling — In no event shall a CLGB for a constituent of concern exceed the <br /> lowest concentration that the discharger demonstrates and the RWQCB finds is <br /> technologically and economically achievable. No provision of this section shall be <br /> taken to allow a CLGB for a constituent of concern to exceed the maximum <br /> concentration that would be allowed under other applicable statutes or regulations <br /> [e.g., Maximum Concentration Limits established under the federal Safe Drinking <br /> Water Act...]. <br /> 47. If the Discharger wishes the Board to consider concentration limits greater than <br /> background, then the Discharger shall submit an amended Report of Waste <br /> Discharge addressing all of the requirements set forth in section 20400 of Title 27. <br /> 48. Water Code section 13267, subdivision (b)(1) states that: <br /> In conducting an investigation specified in subdivision (a), the regional board may require <br /> that any person who has discharged, discharges, or is suspected of having discharged or <br /> discharging, or who proposes to discharge waste within its region... shall furnish, under <br /> penalty of perjury, technical or monitoring program reports which the regional board <br /> requires. The burden, including costs, of these reports shall bear a reasonable <br />