Laserfiche WebLink
California Regional W A r 2 Nov a er 20, 1989 <br /> Quality Control Board <br /> large capacity of the basin and the storage space available beneath <br /> the discharge pump level for siltation, the automatic sensing pumps <br /> did not discharge landfill storm water to South Paddy Creek during <br /> the early months of 1989 for sampling. Also, no water ran in South <br /> Paddy Creek for a duration to allow samples to be taken. It is <br /> expected that the same conditions, unless a long period of steady <br /> rainfall would occur, will exist through the end of 1989 . County <br /> Public Works staff is monitoring the detention basin to determine <br /> when the pumps first begin to operate during this rainy seasons. In <br /> the event that the pumps discharge to South Paddy Creek, surface <br /> water samples will be taken according to the specifications of <br /> Monitoring and Reporting Program Number 87-088. <br /> Water from the detention basin was tested for the program surface <br /> water paramater constituents April 11, 1989, and is enclosed with this <br /> report for background data. Testing was done by California Water <br /> Labs. Although no water was running in Paddy creek, it was necessary <br /> to remove some of the water from the basin for both basin and pump <br /> maintenace purposes. The report labeled "Sump/Inside" was taken at <br /> the grated inlet to the pump discharge well; the sample labeled <br /> "Sump/Outlet" was taken just downstream from the pump discharge point <br /> into Paddy Creek. <br /> Ground Water Monitoring: <br /> The water monitoring reports for the second and third quarters of <br /> 1989 are also enclosed. The sampling was performed by California <br /> Water Labs, and contains results for all required quarterly and <br /> annual sampling. Additionally, the reports contain the required <br /> field water level measurements. The water level depth measurements <br /> indicate normal season fluctuations exist for the area and that <br /> neither the ground water direction of flow nor gradient have changed <br /> appreciably. The quality assurance data indicates that the results <br /> are still of good quality. <br /> As in the past, the levels of Chloride, Specific Conductance, Total <br /> Dissolved Solids and Total Hardness detected in the groundwater <br /> sample from MW-4 continue to be at somewhat higher levels than in the <br /> other 3 wells sampled. However, the detected levels of these <br /> parameters in MW-4 do not exceed drinking water standards imposed <br /> under Title 22 and do not indicate any ground water degradation. <br />