My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013675_STAFF REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DELTA
>
7300
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1800316
>
SU0013675_STAFF REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2021 4:06:51 PM
Creation date
5/13/2021 3:51:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
STAFF REPORT
RECORD_ID
SU0013675
PE
2625
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1800316
STREET_NUMBER
7300
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DELTA
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
TRACY
Zip
95304-
APN
21302038, 21302041
ENTERED_DATE
10/6/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
7300 W DELTA AVE
RECEIVED_DATE
10/5/2020 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
EHIntern
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t" > CALIFIA, LLC. <br /> July 28,2020 <br /> Mr,Giuseppe Sanfilippo <br /> San Joaquin County Community Development Department <br /> 1810 Gast Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton,CA 95205 <br /> Subject: County Planning Commission Review of PA-1800316(Proposed Slaughterhouse <br /> at 7300 Delta Avenue,Tracy,CA)- Revised Application and Negative <br /> Declaration <br /> Dear Mr.Sanfilippo: <br /> We first provided comments on this application on February 6,2020;a copy of that letter is <br /> attached. We are in receipt of the notice for the resubmitted application,site plan and initial <br /> study,as well as County staff's recommendation for the adoption of a mitigated negative <br /> declaration for the revised proposal We continue to have concerns regarding the proposal and <br /> the appropriateness of a negative declaration with the information that has been provided, We <br /> note the following issues: <br /> 1. Lack of Detail in Protect Description and Deferral of lmbact Analyses;The project <br /> description states that"the facility will process on average of one(1)animal per day." <br /> The referral and initial study do not include specifics as to the types of animal <br /> Slaughtered,where the carcasses will be stored before final disposal,where they are to be <br /> disposed of,what odor and water quality controls will be in place for the remains and <br /> other appropriate mitigations for such a facility.We are also concerned that the site plan <br /> ROWS a"future slaughterhouse,office and general purpose ag barn,"which indicates an <br /> inerementalization of the use into a larger facility that the CEQA review being offered <br /> does not analyze.Under Sundstrom v.County of Mendocino,202 Cal,App.3d 296 <br /> (1988),and Gentry v.City of Murrieta,36 Cal.App.4th 1359(1995),the determination <br /> of whether a project will have significant environmental impacts,and the formulation of <br /> measures to mitigate those impacts,must occur before the project is approved;they <br /> cannot be segmented.We do not believe the whole of the action is being considered and <br /> that additional impacts are either not being fully described or are being deferred. <br /> 2. Air Quality Impacts:As stated in Section III of the initial Study,"the facility will process <br /> on average one(1)animal per day"and that"the second use is a chicken farm for a <br /> maximum of 1,500 chickens within a 6,000 sq.ft.enclosure with two(2)800 square foot <br /> metal agricultural barns for the storage of manure."As you were notified in our February <br /> 6,2020 letter,we are the property owners and developer of the River Islands Master <br /> Planned Community within the City of Lathrop,only one(l)mile from the project site. <br /> River islands is an approved urban development that already has constructed 2,000 <br /> residences,two schools,parks,and other nob-residential uses.The River Islands project <br /> Planning Commission Staff Report, PA-1800316(UP) 141 <br /> Response Letters <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.