Laserfiche WebLink
Potentially Less Than Less Than Analyzed <br /> Si nificant Sig nificantwith Si nificant No In The <br /> g Mitigation 9 <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR <br /> XVII.TRANSPORTATION. <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or policy <br /> addressing the circulation system, including transit, El El El E El <br /> roadways, bicycle,and pedestrian facilities? <br /> b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA <br /> Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision(b)? <br /> c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design <br /> feature(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or <br /> incompatible uses(e.g..farm equipment)? <br /> d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ <br /> Impact Discussion: <br /> a-d) The project is a Use Permit application for an animal processing facility and chicken farm on a three(3)acre portion <br /> of one(1) legal parcel totaling 40.39-acres in the AG-40(General Agriculture, 40-acre minimum). Operations are <br /> planned for eight(8) hours a day, seven(7)days a week with three(3)full time employees and two(2) part-time <br /> employees,and are expected to generate an average of ten(10)vehicle trips per day. The project was screened <br /> out from completing a Vehicle Miles Traveled(VMT)analysis based on the square footage of buildings proposed <br /> for this project.Therefore,this project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact on traffic, <br /> The project is not expected to conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the vehicle circulation <br /> system.There will be no changes to the geometric design of roads or to emergency access routes.The proposed <br /> Emergency access is provided by a fire rcadlaccess road with adequate width and surfacing.The proposed project <br /> is not expected to result in inadequate emergency access. <br /> 27 <br /> Planning Commission Staff Report, PA-1800316(UP) 31 <br /> Environmental Review <br />