Laserfiche WebLink
GEOMATRIX <br /> cleaned up with silica gel to remove any soluble biogenic material (e.g., naturally occurring <br /> polar compounds or metabolites resulting from intrinsic bioremediation of petroleum). TPHd <br /> was not detected in these samples, indicating that July 1998 results were positively biased due <br /> to the presence of soluble biogenic material. Geomatrix also analyzed groundwater samples for <br /> PAHs using detection limits 100 times lower than those applied to samples collected by <br /> Radian; these analyses were done to confirm that PAHs are not present in groundwater above <br /> WQOs (e.g.,MCLs). PAHs were not detected in any of the.groundwater samples. <br /> These combined results indicate that the residual petroleum is not providing a source of <br /> dissolved petroleum constituents to groundwater. Groundwater analytical results are <br /> summarized on Figure 4 and in Table 5. <br /> 4.4 SEPARATE-PHASE PETROLEUM <br /> Monitoring well MW-1 contained approximately 6 inches of separate-phase petroleum on the <br /> water surface. Separate-phase petroleum is limited to the vicinity of well MVV-1; samples <br /> collected from borings advanced within approximately 44 feet of SB-8/MW-1 exhibited no <br /> separate-phase petroleum or significant amounts of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents. The <br /> estimated lateral extent of petroleum-affected soil in this area is shown on Figure 5. Geomatrix <br /> collected a sample of separate-phase petroleum from well MW-1 on October 23, 1998, and <br /> submitted the sample to Chevron Research and Technology Company(CRTC) for a chemical <br /> fingerprint evaluation. CRTC reported that the sample was composed of"evaporated crude <br /> oil...typical of may California San Joaquin Valley Crudes." The report also states that the <br /> sample contained no evidence of diesel fuel or lube oil, and that if these products were present <br /> they would be masked by the presence of the crude oil. A copy of the analytical report, along <br /> with the chromatogram, is presented in Appendix E. <br /> 4.5 SUMMARY OF RESULTS <br /> The sail underlying the site is composed primarily of silts and clays,with gravels present at 25 <br /> feet bgs; groundwater occurs between 30 and 32 feet bgs (Figure 6). As shown on Figures 5 <br /> and 6, residual petroleum(i.e.,highly weathered crude oil) is found beneath the site primarily <br /> at depths of approximately 15 to 50 feet bgs in the immediate vicinity of a section of the former <br /> pipeline adjacent to borings SB-8 and MW-1. Benzene and MTBE were not detected in any of <br /> the soil samples. Low concentrations of ethylbenzene,toluene, and xylenes, along with various <br /> PAHs, are collocated with the residual petroleum at depths of 15 feet bgs and greater. <br /> Approximately 6 inches of separate-phase petroleum was estimated to be in well MW-1; <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon constituents were not detected in groundwater samples collected from <br /> 11s131degtdata Doc_SaPe15�OQs1591 I1Sl HRA RpIAM 9 <br />