Laserfiche WebLink
Geofogica[Tecfuucs Inc. Page 8 <br /> Hunter Container <br /> - Report-Soil and Groundwater Investigation <br /> Project No.397.2 <br /> October 25, 1996 <br /> The spatial relationship of the upper boundary of the petroleum hydrocarbons beginning <br /> deeper in MW-1 (34 feet from the pipeline) than in SB-2 (16 feet from the pipeline) supports <br /> the theory that the petroleum hydrocarbons were sourced from the pipeline and not from <br /> Hunter Container. The cross section attached in Figure 3 shows the spatial relationship of <br /> these factors. <br /> Septic Tank Water <br /> A sample of the water from the second chamber septic tank was collected and tested for <br /> purgeable and extractable petroleum hydrocarbons, halogenated solvents, and CAM 17 <br /> metals. The septic tank sample results show low concentrations of purgeable and extractable <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons, trace amounts of three metals (chromium, copper, and zinc), and no <br /> volatile organic compounds (i.e., halogenated solvents). However, because matrix effects <br /> and/or other factors required additional sample dilution, the reporting limits for the <br /> halogenated solvent sample have been raised. <br /> �a <br /> The source of the petroleum hydrocarbons found in the septic tank is not clearly understood. <br /> So, on October 21, 1996, Ray Kablanow of GTI met with George Ymashita, Ray Morris, and <br /> Doug Frans of US Can to discuss the operation of the facility and to evaluate possible <br /> sources for these chemicals. A list of the current and past chemicals used at this facility is <br /> included in Appendix C, along with MSDS for currently used chemicals solutions or <br /> materials. <br /> I <br /> An audit evaluation inspection of the new US Can facility shows that they run a very clean <br /> i operation and take precaution to ensure adequate compliance with environmental regulations. <br /> There are no floor drains; however, there are two sewer line clean-out access ports in the <br /> floor, both with lids. There are no sinks in the factory work area, only in the restroom and <br /> breakroom. <br /> J Three possible sources of these chemicals were identified: <br /> 1) Construction workers may have disposed of these chemicals during final phases of the <br /> facility construction. In the event the construction workers disposed of petroleum waste <br /> in the septic system,then it was a one time event and is not re-occurring. _ <br /> 2) Mop water disposed of in the sewer from a complete factory floor mopping event that <br /> occurred about two weeks ago. The mop water probably carried solvents, thinners, oil, <br /> standard sweep (anadsorbent) and minute particulate metal fragments from around the <br /> cutting machines and from the machine shop. In the event the mop water was the source, <br /> that also was a one time event because US Can has decided to containerize the mop water <br /> and not dispose of it in the sewer. <br /> 1 3) Hand washing with cleaners by factory workers. This is not believed to be a significant <br /> volume input and probably only accounts for 100 to 200 gallons per day. <br /> US Can estimate that 500 to 1,000 gallons of gray water and sewer water are discharged to <br /> the septic tank each day of operation and is sourced only from toilets (low volume flush) and <br /> washing of hands in the sink. The volume of the septic tank is 2,000 gallons and the leach <br /> line from the tank is located on the northwest corner of the property. <br /> The concentration of petroleum hydrocarbons in the septic water is not high enough to cause <br /> environmental degradation of the soil in the leach line area. This is concluded because leach <br /> lines function in a manner so that the water does not percolate down but evaporates up <br /> through the soil column. Therefore, the chemicals that make it through the tank and enter the <br /> soil around the leach line will be degraded by the bacteria in the moist soil environment. <br />