Laserfiche WebLink
Mr.M. Scott Mansholt—CEMC <br /> Second Quarter 2006 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Report July 11,2006 <br /> US Can-Welty Road Page 4 of 5 <br /> No TPHg or BTEX were detected in the groundwater samples. No TPHd was detected in MW-5. <br /> TPHd at concentrations of 190 and 160 gg/L were detected in the field and field duplicate <br /> samples from WFSMW-1,respectively. No PAHs were detected in the groundwater samples <br /> during the second quarter 2006. The groundwater analytical results are presented in Tables 2 and <br /> 3. A petroleum-hydrocarbon distribution map is presented as Figure 4. A copy of the laboratory <br /> analytical report is included in Attachment B. <br /> QUARTERLY OLEOPHILIC SOCK REPLACEMENT <br /> An oleophilic sock was installed in well MW-1 due to the presence of SPO in the well and an <br /> oleophilic sock was placed in MW-2 due to the petroleum odor detected from the well. The socks <br /> in MW-1 and MW-2 have been monitored and replaced as necessary on a quarterly basis. During <br /> the second quarter 2006,the oleophilic sock from MW-1 was weighed but not replaced, and <br /> approximately 7 ounces (0.07 gallon)of SPO had been absorbed. The oleophilic sock from <br /> MW-2 was also weighed but not replaced, and approximately 5 ounces(0.05 gallon)of SPO had <br /> been absorbed. A summary of SPO thickness measurements is included in Table 1. <br /> QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) <br /> All field procedures were conducted in accordance with SAIC's Quality Assurance and Quality <br /> Control Sample Collection, Handling, and Analysis 3procedures. Based on SAIC's evaluation,all <br /> analytical data are usable as qualified for the purpose of determining chemical concentrations in <br /> groundwater at the site. <br /> The result for naphthalene detected in the equipment rinsate blank,QA-R,was qualified"J" <br /> because the concentration was between the laboratory method detection limit and reporting limit. <br /> The final result for this sample is 0.019 Jµg/L. <br /> The data usability summary and the laboratory reports are presented as Attachment B. Unless <br /> noted otherwise, analytical data collected in support of this investigation are considered precise, <br /> accurate,representative, complete, and comparable, and they may be used for their intended <br /> purposes. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Groundwater elevations from the site wells indicate that groundwater flow was to the northeast at <br /> an approximate gradient of 0.001 ft/ft during the second quarter 2006. No dissolved-phase TPHg <br /> or BTEX appear to be present at the site. TPHd were detected in field sample and field duplicate <br /> samples collected from WFSMW-1 at concentrations of 190 and 160µg/L,respectively. No <br /> TPHd were detected in the sample from MW-5. No PAHs were detected in the groundwater <br /> samples during the second quarter 2006. SPO has been observed in wells MW-1 and MW-2 <br /> since 1999. TPHg and TPHd appear to be present in the SPO in the vicinity of wells MW-1 and <br /> MW-2. <br /> SAIC recommends continued quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling of wells MW-1 <br /> through MW-5 and WFSMW-1. SAIC is preparing a work plan to properly destroy and replace <br /> wells MW-3 and MW-4 because the water volumes in these wells are insufficient for adequate <br /> sample collection. The work plan will be submitted during the third quarter of 2006. Oleophilic <br /> socks in wells MW-1 and MW-2 will be monitored quarterly and replaced as necessary. When <br /> 3. SAIC,2006. Quality Assurance and Quality Control Sample Collection,Handling,and Analysis. January <br /> (Update). <br />