My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014093
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
POCK
>
2706
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2100062
>
SU0014093
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2025 4:23:22 PM
Creation date
5/25/2021 7:58:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014093
PE
2611 - SUBDIVISION - MAJOR (SU)
STREET_NUMBER
2706
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
POCK
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
17912013, 11, 14
CURRENT_STATUS
Closed - Issued
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
2706 S POCK LN STOCKTON 95205
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1838
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The project site is not part of a State Responsibility Area, and Cal Fire maps indicate the <br />site and vicinity are not designated within a High Fire Hazard Severity Zone or higher. <br />The project site is in an area not prone to wildfires, and wildfire risk would be reduced <br />with project development and subsequent reduction in open space area. The project <br />would have no impact related to exposure of project occupants to wildfire hazards. <br />c) Installation and Maintenance of Infrastructure. <br />As noted, the project site is not in an area prone to wildfires. Infrastructure to serve the <br />project, for the most part, has been installed except for proposed onsite infrastructure to <br />serve the proposed lots. There would be no increase in fire risk due to the installation and <br />maintenance of this infrastructure, as it would be installed within an area that would be <br />developed for urban uses. The project would have no impact on this issue. <br />d) Risks from Runoff, Post -Fire Slope Instability, or Drainage Changes. <br />The project site is in a topographically flat area. Duck Creek crosses the project site, but <br />it is mostly located in valley areas. As such, it is not expected that people or structures <br />would be exposed to significant risks from changes resulting from fires in steeper areas to <br />the east, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides. The project would <br />have no impact related to risks from runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage <br />changes. <br />3.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Potentially with Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant <br />Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact <br />a) Does the project have the potential to substantially <br />degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce <br />the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or <br />wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, <br />threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, <br />substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare <br />or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important <br />examples of the major periods of California history or <br />prehistory? <br />b) Does the project have impacts that are individually <br />limited, but cumulatively considerable? "Cumulatively <br />considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project <br />are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects <br />of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the <br />effects of probable future projects)? <br />c) Does the project have environmental effects which would <br />cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either <br />directly or indirectly? <br />Pock Lane Public Review Draft IS/MND 3-74 May 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.