Laserfiche WebLink
The project site is not part of a State Responsibility Area, and Cal Fire maps indicate the <br />site and vicinity are not designated within a High Fire Hazard Severity Zone or higher. <br />The project site is in an area not prone to wildfires, and wildfire risk would be reduced <br />with project development and subsequent reduction in open space area. The project <br />would have no impact related to exposure of project occupants to wildfire hazards. <br />c) Installation and Maintenance of Infrastructure. <br />As noted, the project site is not in an area prone to wildfires. Infrastructure to serve the <br />project, for the most part, has been installed except for proposed onsite infrastructure to <br />serve the proposed lots. There would be no increase in fire risk due to the installation and <br />maintenance of this infrastructure, as it would be installed within an area that would be <br />developed for urban uses. The project would have no impact on this issue. <br />d) Risks from Runoff, Post -Fire Slope Instability, or Drainage Changes. <br />The project site is in a topographically flat area. Duck Creek crosses the project site, but <br />it is mostly located in valley areas. As such, it is not expected that people or structures <br />would be exposed to significant risks from changes resulting from fires in steeper areas to <br />the east, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides. The project would <br />have no impact related to risks from runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage <br />changes. <br />3.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Potentially with Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant <br />Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact <br />a) Does the project have the potential to substantially <br />degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce <br />the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or <br />wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, <br />threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, <br />substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare <br />or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important <br />examples of the major periods of California history or <br />prehistory? <br />b) Does the project have impacts that are individually <br />limited, but cumulatively considerable? "Cumulatively <br />considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project <br />are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects <br />of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the <br />effects of probable future projects)? <br />c) Does the project have environmental effects which would <br />cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either <br />directly or indirectly? <br />Pock Lane Public Review Draft IS/MND 3-74 May 2022 <br />