My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COPPEROPOLIS
>
10848
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0536777
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2021 2:35:44 PM
Creation date
5/27/2021 2:24:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0536777
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0021126
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER COUNTRYSIDE MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
10848
STREET_NAME
COPPEROPOLIS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
10311006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
10848 COPPEROPOLIS RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Air Sparging Pilot Test Related Activities Report and Remedial Action Work Plan <br />Former Countryside Market, Stockton, California April 30, 2015 <br />2.0 BACKGROUND AND PHYSICAL SETTING <br />2.1 Site Location and Description <br />The Site is located in eastern San Joaquin County, approximately two miles east of the city <br />limits of Stockton, and southeast of the intersection of Copperopolis Road and Tulsa Road. The <br />Site vicinity is primarily rural residential and agricultural. Currently, the Site is vacant with the <br />current property owner occupying a single-family residence on a separate parcel of land directly <br />south of the Site. <br />The Former Countryside Market acted as a gasoline service station and convenience stored <br />that dispensed fuel via two 1,000-gallon USTs. It does not appear a permit to operate/own <br />USTs was completed so the age of the tanks is unclear. However, USTs were removed under <br />San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division (SJCEHD) permit in March 1993, which is <br />presented in Section 2.4. <br />2.2 Physical Setting <br />The City of Stockton is centrally located in San Joaquin County in the north end of the San <br />Joaquin Valley. The Site lies approximately six miles east of Stockton's city center at an <br />elevation of 52 feet above mean sea level (amsl). Results of this Site investigation indicate fine <br />alluvial sediments to depths of 120 feet below ground surface (bgs) consisting of sandy clay and <br />clayey sand. Groundwater was initially encountered at approximately 92.5 to 93 feet bgs during <br />drilling activities. Depth to groundwater in monitoring wells ranged from 98.10 to 99.73 feet <br />below top of casing (TOC) during the first quarter 2015 groundwater monitoring activities (SGI, <br />2015a). Water levels have been consistently dropping likely due to regional drought conditions. <br />2.3 Previous Environmental Investigations <br />In March 1993, Stockton Service Equipment Company removed two 1,000-gallon leaded- <br />gasoline USTs from the Site. Four soil samples (TK1N, TK1S, TK2N, and TK2S) were collected <br />from beneath the USTs at depths of approximately 7.5 feet bgs. The samples were analyzed <br />for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and <br />xylenes (BTEX compounds), ethylene dibromide (EDB), and total lead. TPHg was detected in <br />all four samples at concentrations ranging from 770 to 6,500 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). <br />The excavated soil was subsequently returned to the excavation, and no investigation was <br />performed (UEC, 2001). Historical soil samples results are included in Appendix B. <br />In October 1995, approximately 40 cubic yards of hydrocarbon-impacted soil was excavated <br />and replaced with clean backfill. The former UST pit was excavated to 11 and 13 feet bgs. Soil <br />sample CM-1-13 collected from the bottom of the excavation indicated TPHg, BTEX compounds <br />at concentrations of 14,000 mg/kg and not detected (ND) at a laboratory reporting limit (RL) of <br />0.005 mg/kg, 37 mg/kg, 78 mg/kg, and 340 mg/kg, respectively. The excavation was backfilled <br />with clean stockpiled soil and clean pea gravel (UEC, 1995). <br />2-1 The Source Group, Inc.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.