Laserfiche WebLink
Backus, Garrett [EHD] <br />From: Jason Boone <Jason.Boone@vrcmetalsystems.com> <br />Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 1:10 PM <br />To: Backus, Garrett [EHD] <br />Cc: Mike Belmont; Terree Matson; Henry, Michelle D [EHD]; Michelle Le <br />Subject: RE: Emailing: RTC form for Stockton Propeller, dated 7-2-2021, RTC Evidence <br />Attachments: J. Boone, 08-10-2021.pdf, IMG_7365.JPG; disposal record used oiljpg; Manifest Paint <br />Waste 10-11-2021.PDF; Paint Waste.JPEG; Used Oil.JPEG <br />CAUTION: This email is originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the <br />sender and know the content is safe. <br />Violation 106 -training. <br />The training document is not complete and a sign -off sheet was not provided. <br />1. It does not discuss non-RCRA hazardous waste determinations. <br />2. The satellite container information is not consistent with California regulation. <br />3. The document references RCRA empty containers. Empty containers at this facility must comply with California (non- <br />RCRA) empty container rules. <br />We have entered into NES partnership program which will provide required training to all necessary <br />employees. Their first onsite visit was October 12, at which point we are scheduling training for November. <br />My department offers free classes here in basic hazardous waste management: https://ehd- <br />training.sjgov.org/app/TrainingClasses.aspx <br />To date, we have 1 person that has completed basic hazardous waste management training. Cert attached. <br />We have 2 more registered to attend on October 19. <br />Violation 202 - I did not receive photos of the labeled and closed waste alodine containers. There were two containers <br />of this waste observed during the inspection. <br />Item 202 in the inspection report does not list a violation for the labeling of Alodine containers. Only one <br />container is contained in photo log of a waste Alodine container (IMG_6029). We do have a photo of this <br />container labeled (attached IMG _7365) that was included in the 'complete response'. There is no 2nd container <br />of Alodine waste. If you are referencing the 2 containers in IMG -6025 of the photo log, these are not waste. <br />Violation 605 - labeling <br />1. The "Paint Waste Accumulation" photo shows an accumulation start date of 2-11-20. Since this waste has been <br />accumulated greater than 180 days, please dispose of this waste and provide a disposal record. <br />See attached disposal record, "Manifest Paint Waste". <br />2. The "Warehouse, Used Oil " photo does not include the words "mineral spirits" in the composition <br />section. Since this is a combination of used oil and mineral spirits include the words "mineral spirits" and "used <br />oil" on the label. Mineral spirits is not the same as used oil due to a lower flash point. The label also shows an <br />accumulation start date of 11-21-20. Since this waste has been accumulated greater than 180 days, please <br />dispose of this waste and provide a disposal record. <br />a. See attached disposal record, "Used Oil". <br />b. See attached photo "IMG _0660". No accumulation had occurred at the time of the photo, so <br />accumulation start date is intentionally left blank. <br />The "Paint Waste Satellite" photo has an accumulation date of "satellite". Change to a specific date or use <br />"daily" or "weekly" if the container is dumped into the larger paint accumulation container. <br />