My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
1245
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542201
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2021 4:35:41 PM
Creation date
6/1/2021 4:13:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0542201
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024238
FACILITY_NAME
JM EQUIPMENT COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
1245
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16323034
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1245 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADVISORY - ACTIVE SOIL GAS INVESTIGATIONS <br />6.5 SOIL GAS SAMPLE ANALYSIS AND LABORATORY REPORTING <br />6.5.1 Analytical Methods <br />At sites that are not fully characterized, soil gas samples should be analyzed using only <br />USEPA modified analytical methods 8260B, TO-15, TO-17, or equivalent. At well- <br />characterized sites, alternative methods may be used for monitoring contamination <br />where VOCs are known to be present and confirmed based on previous gas <br />chromatograph/ mass spectrometer (GC/MS) analyses. Non-specific portable organic <br />vapor analyzers and/or GC-based hand-held detectors can provide useful information for <br />selecting samples for laboratory analysis and verifying the integrity of collected samples. <br />However, these instruments are not acceptable substitutes for compound-specific <br />analysis due to a lack of QA/QC protocols. The various available VOC analytical <br />methods are discussed in detail in Appendix F. Additional discussion is provided in <br />Appendix E specific to soil gas containing naphthalene. <br />If new VOC(s) are detected by a non-GC/MS method during routine monitoring, then at <br />least 10 percent of the samples for each newly identified VOC should be confirmed by a <br />GC/MS method. Thereafter, routine monitoring can resume with the non-GC/MS <br />method, including the newly identified analyte(s). <br />6.5.2 Contaminant Reporting <br />Laboratory reports should contain the analytical results for all identified quantifiable <br />contaminants, along with all tentatively identified compounds (TICs) with an estimated <br />concentration. The site's QAPP should specify that TICs will be identified and reported. <br />6.5.3 Leak Check Compounds <br />Liquid and gaseous leak check compounds should be included in the laboratory analyte <br />list. The laboratory reports should quantify and annotate all detections of the leak check <br />compound the target analyte reporting limits. For additional information on leak check <br />compounds, refer to Section 4.2. <br />6.5.4 Auto Samplers <br />Using an autosampler with modified USEPA Method 8260B/C for soil gas analysis is not <br />reliable. Sample loss may occur from the vials during the sample transfer and sample <br />run. In addition, the vials may sit in the autosampler for an extended period of time <br />which may compromise the sample through leakage at the vial seal (See Appendix F, <br />GC/MS Methods Section for additional information). <br />July 2015 39
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.