SU0014077 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvement is not likely to cause significant public health problems. • This finding can be made since CDD has concluded(based on the Specific Plan I/Initial Study) that the design of the subdivisions, as conditioned,would either have no impact or less than significant impact on the health of future residents. 7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. • This finding can be made because there are no public access easements that would be acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision that will be negatively affected by the proposed subdivision. 8. Any land or improvement to be dedicated to a public agency is consistent with the General Plan, the Master Plan, any applicable Specific Plan, any applicable Special Purpose Plan, and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. • This finding can be made since the lands or improvements to be dedicated to the MHCSD are consistent with the Public Land Equity Program and/or required to meet the MHCSD Design Manual, both of which are implementation measures for the General Plan, Master Plan, and Specific Plan II. 9. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, as required by Government Code 66473.1. • This finding can be made because the subdivision incorporates the use of deciduous tree species to provide shade in the summer and solar access in the winter. 10. All applicable provisions of the Mountain House Development Agreement have been met. • This finding can be made since the consistency analysis that has been conducted has found that the proposed subdivision is consistent with the provisions of the Master Development Agreement (i.e. the Mountain House Development Agreement) and the Specific Plan II Development Agreement, both of which requires consistency with adopted community plans. PA-1000266 & PA-1000267— Findings 2