Laserfiche WebLink
Pilot Study Workplan May 25, 2018 <br />Diamond Foods Inc. Page 4 <br />On October 13, 2004, a geologist from ATC supervised the advancement of two soil borings, SB10 and <br />SB11, to collect soil samples for use in a bench scale test. Soil boring SB10 was advanced at an <br />approximate 35 degree angle from vertical in a southerly direction, beneath the cooling unit. Soil <br />samples were collected at three different depths in order to assess the potential presence of hexavalent <br />chromium. Assuming drilling angles and using trigonometric functions, the soil sampling intervals <br />correspond to vertical depths of approximately 13.6 to 17.3 feet bgs, 23.3 to 27.1 feet bgs, and 33.4 to <br />37.3 feet bgs, respectively. Soil boring SB11 was advanced vertically in the vicinity of MW-7 to an <br />approximate depth of 39.5 feet bgs and soil samples were collected to further assess the lateral extent <br />of hexavalent chromium impacted soil in the vicinity of MW-7. SB11 is located hydraulically <br />crossgradient with respect to Vault 8 and the cooling unit. Soil samples were collected from SB11 at <br />vertical depth intervals of 15 to 19.5 feet bgs, 25 to 29.5 feet bgs, and 35 to 39.5 feet bgs. The soil <br />samples collected from SB11 were visually inspected to ensure the lithology was similar to that of the <br />samples collected from SB10. The purpose of soil sample collection from SB11 was to provide non- <br />impacted control samples or samples representative of background concentrations for baseline <br />characterization and bench scale testing. The concentrations of hexavalent chromium detected in the <br />soil samples collected from beneath the chiller unit were low and were comparable to the <br />concentrations detected in the soil samples collected from beyond the known extent of hexavalent <br />chromium impacted soil. It was concluded that it was possible that previously impacted soil beneath <br />the cooling unit has been flushed over time by cooling water leaching into the subsurface, resulting in <br />low concentrations of hexavalent chromium in the soil. Due to the production of elevated manganese <br />concentrations, bench scale testing of zero valance nano-scale iron was recommended. This material <br />was shown to reduce hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium and may have less propensity to <br />produce high manganese concentrations as a secondary affect to groundwater (ATC, 2005a). <br />On August 1, 2005, the facility well (FVV) was permanently abandoned. FW was destroyed by using a <br />Mills Knife to perforate the entire length of the well casing. The perforating tool was removed from the <br />well and a cement and sand mixture (10 sack) was pumped into the well under pressure using tremmie <br />pipe that was placed at the bottom of the well and raised as the cement and sand mixture rose to the <br />top of the casing. The vault was filled with the cement and sand mixture to within approximately one <br />foot of the top of the vault (at grade). Approximately 13.5 cubic yards of the cement and sand mixture <br />were pumped into the well and vault (ATC, 2005b). <br />Groundwater monitoring and sampling has been conducted quarterly following the installation of each <br />monitoring well in accordance with MRP R5-2004-0840. In August 2011, ATC requested a reduction in <br />frequency and analyses. The CVRWQCB issued a revised MRP (No. R5-815-2011) which reduced the <br />frequency of groundwater monitoring and sampling from quarterly to semi-annual and reduced the <br />laboratory analytical regime. This sampling schedule has been followed until the present. <br />On June 2, 2015, monitoring well MW-4 was replaced. The casing of MW4 had previously been found <br />to be obstructed and could not be sampled. Well replacement activities consisted of over-drilling and <br />re-installing one existing site-related monitoring well within the same boring. The replacement well <br />(MW-4R) was constructed with a 20 foot screen interval of 0.010-inch slotted Schedule-40, 2-inch <br />diameter PVC extending from 45 to 65 feet bgs. On June 9, 2015, replacement monitoring well MW-4R <br />was developed. <br />On June 3 and 4, 2015, two nested groundwater observation wells, OBSW-S and OBSW-D were <br />installed at the site near existing monitoring well MW-3 and in the vicinity of Vaults 7 and 8. The wells <br />were constructed to the depths of approximately 55 feet below ground surface (bgs) and 75 bgs, <br />respectively. Shallow observation well OBSW-S was constructed with 10 feet of 0.010-inch slotted <br />Schedule 40 2-inch diameter PVC casing extending from approximately 45 to 55 feet bgs. Deep <br />observation well OBSW-D was constructed with 5 feet of 0.010-inch slotted Schedule 40 2-inch