Laserfiche WebLink
I la. Site does not qualify for further remedial I I lb. Site may qualify for further I RCRA site assessment under CERCLA action, but is deferred to: I I NRC (Site Evaluation Accomplished - SEA) <br />I 2. Further Assessment Needed Under CERCLA: 2a. (optional) Priority: I I Higher I I Lower <br />2b. Activity I I PA <br />Type: I I SI <br />I I ESI <br />I HRS evaluation <br />64)1 <br />Signature: <br />Report Reviewed, <br />Approved, and Site <br />Decision Made by: <br />EPA Forrn t 9100-3 Rev. 5/93 <br />Date: <br />I I Other: <br />er Remedial Site Assessment under CERCLA (Superfund) Is mg required because: <br />DECISIONy <br />1. I 1. Fu <br />r <br />REMEDIAL SITE ASSESSMENT DECISION - EPA REGION IX <br />Site Name: Cal Ce_dc,v- Pro c) Oc,t s Compco7 EPA ION: CA-b /5-77 -7Ce <br />Alias Site Names: <br />City: S-1-0C-k.:VOY\ County or Parish: Sct r‘ \.) State: CA' <br /> <br />Refer to Report Dated: 57 2-'1 /13 <br /> <br />Report type:C-\ AA 'Ackv <br />Li <br />-k-/ AsscssAler‘-t- <br /> <br />Report developed by: Bechtel Environmental. Inc. <br />