Laserfiche WebLink
Monitoring Report Compliance Oklist <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> RWQCB <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A Reviewer Comment <br /> WDRs/MRP/ Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Standard <br /> Provisions 1. Are all groundwater Field Parameters X <br /> (Sept 93/Aug 97) Monitoring Parameter, and CDCs <br /> (if required) sampled and analyzed? <br /> in. Have any groundwater concentration X Chloromethane and methylene <br /> limits been exceeded? If yes, identify chloride were detected in well G- <br /> in comments. 5• <br /> n. Is there a description and graphical X Groundwater contours are <br /> presentation of groundwater flow' erroneous if the elevations on <br /> direction and gradient? Table 1 are correct. <br /> o. Monitoring Wells: Is there a X Need to record the time after <br /> description,method,and time purging <br /> of water level measurement and <br /> well recovery time? <br /> p. Purging: Is there a description X <br /> of the purging method,purge <br /> pump and its placement, and <br /> field parameters? <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> VOCs were not detected except in G-5. Methylene chloride(0.0711) µg/1) and chloromethane (0.238) µg/1) <br /> were detected in G-5. The county did not resample because they consider methylene chloride to be a <br /> common"laboratory contaminant",however the methylene chloride was not detected in the laboratory <br /> QA/QC reports. Well G-5 should be resampled for VOCs. <br /> Time series plots indicate that nitrogen as nitrate should be carefully evaluated. <br /> A well completion diagram with field boring log has not been provided for the new well. We requested <br /> submittal of this data by 15 January 2001 in our 19 December 2000 letter. <br /> The groundwater contours shown in Figure 3 are erroneous. Map must be redrawn and resubmitted, text <br /> discussion of groundwater flow (page 8) should be resubmitted as necessary. <br /> Units of concentration for the 5-year constituents listed on Table 2 are not indicated. <br /> Hexavalent chromium was detected in leachate sample L-1 at 0.00185)mg/l, but the laboratory control spike <br /> sample (LCS) also detected 104% (0.0522 mg/1) of the spike amount(0.05 mg/1). <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: <br /> Date: 20 March 2001 <br />