My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2000-2005
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
17720
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440058
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2000-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2023 1:56:53 PM
Creation date
6/14/2021 3:15:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2000-2005
RECORD_ID
PR0440058
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004518
FACILITY_NAME
NORTH COUNTY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
17720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06512004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17720 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
534
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring Report Compliance Oklist <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> RWQCB <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A Reviewer Comment <br /> WDRs/MRP/ Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Standard <br /> Provisions 1. Are all groundwater Field Parameters X <br /> (Sept 93/Aug 97) Monitoring Parameter, and CDCs <br /> (if required) sampled and analyzed? <br /> in. Have any groundwater concentration X Chloromethane and methylene <br /> limits been exceeded? If yes, identify chloride were detected in well G- <br /> in comments. 5• <br /> n. Is there a description and graphical X Groundwater contours are <br /> presentation of groundwater flow' erroneous if the elevations on <br /> direction and gradient? Table 1 are correct. <br /> o. Monitoring Wells: Is there a X Need to record the time after <br /> description,method,and time purging <br /> of water level measurement and <br /> well recovery time? <br /> p. Purging: Is there a description X <br /> of the purging method,purge <br /> pump and its placement, and <br /> field parameters? <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> VOCs were not detected except in G-5. Methylene chloride(0.0711) µg/1) and chloromethane (0.238) µg/1) <br /> were detected in G-5. The county did not resample because they consider methylene chloride to be a <br /> common"laboratory contaminant",however the methylene chloride was not detected in the laboratory <br /> QA/QC reports. Well G-5 should be resampled for VOCs. <br /> Time series plots indicate that nitrogen as nitrate should be carefully evaluated. <br /> A well completion diagram with field boring log has not been provided for the new well. We requested <br /> submittal of this data by 15 January 2001 in our 19 December 2000 letter. <br /> The groundwater contours shown in Figure 3 are erroneous. Map must be redrawn and resubmitted, text <br /> discussion of groundwater flow (page 8) should be resubmitted as necessary. <br /> Units of concentration for the 5-year constituents listed on Table 2 are not indicated. <br /> Hexavalent chromium was detected in leachate sample L-1 at 0.00185)mg/l, but the laboratory control spike <br /> sample (LCS) also detected 104% (0.0522 mg/1) of the spike amount(0.05 mg/1). <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: <br /> Date: 20 March 2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.