My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2000-2005
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
17720
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440058
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2000-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2023 1:56:53 PM
Creation date
6/14/2021 3:15:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2000-2005
RECORD_ID
PR0440058
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004518
FACILITY_NAME
NORTH COUNTY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
17720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06512004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17720 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
534
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
North County Sanitary Land • -2— <br /> Module <br /> 2—Module 4-Liner Performance Demonstration <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> landfills. We recommend that metals also be considered in the modeling effort as potential pollutants, <br /> such as hexavalent chromium and arsenic, due to their solubility and/or mobility in groundwater. <br /> The Report should include a readable,printed table of historical data for the Board to review in support <br /> of the chosen COCs. Bold the highest value of each COC monitored to date. Provide a comparison of <br /> the modeled numerical values with background concentrations or established Water Quality Protection <br /> Standards, as applicable, for inorganic constituents. Organic constituents should be compared to the <br /> applicable method detection limit for each constituent and the water quality objective' relative to the <br /> most applicable beneficial uses (i.e., chemical constituents, toxicity,tastes and odors)2 of groundwater. <br /> Section 2.4 Site Geology <br /> The Report describes the first 3 feet of soil and %2-foot layer of cemented soil. It should be made clear in <br /> the text that this soil has been removed as part of the excavation for the landfill. <br /> Section 2.5 Groundwater Monitoring System <br /> The Report states that the maximum historical groundwater elevation near proposed Module 4 is—31.56 <br /> feet below MSL and the average elevation since the well was installed is—36.59 feet MSL. <br /> Please provide a discussion of any production, irrigation, and/or domestic wells in the vicinity. Include a <br /> map showing all wells within a one-mile radius of the site. Also,provide a discussion of historical <br /> regional high water levels in the Stockton area. This comment is also appropriate for Section 2.6 in <br /> Highest Anticipated Groundwater section. The San Joaquin County Flood Control District offices <br /> should have historical data referencing the highest groundwater elevations recorded. <br /> Section 2.6 Aquifer Characteristics <br /> Groundwater Quality: This subsection states there is no indication that groundwater beneath the site <br /> has been impacted from land filling activities. The 4th Quarter 2001 report shows that there have been <br /> trace hits of VOCs in G-1, the upgradient well, and G-3D, and G-5. The report states that all VOCs <br /> detected, other than Freon 113 in G-1, were also found in one or more sample blanks. We realize this <br /> information may not have been available when drafting this document,but there has been a history of <br /> trace hits of VOCs at this site historically. Please provide a historical summary of such events. <br /> Section 3.1 Liner System Properties Overview <br /> Paragraph 4 states the Geomembranes are essentially impermeable and can contain gases. Please <br /> provide documentation/information supporting this statement. <br /> 'A Compilation of Water Quality Goals,California Environmental Protection Agency,Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board-Central Valley Region,August 2000,with updates. This document and the latest updates may be found at <br /> www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwgcb5 <br /> 2 Water Quality Control Plan, Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins,Fourth Edition(Basin Plan) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.