Laserfiche WebLink
Consensus Scoring <br /> The consensus decision-making process goal is to seek the agreement of most of the <br /> evaluation committee members, but also to resolve the objections of the minority to achieve the <br /> most agreeable decision. <br /> Consensus scoring of solutions has the benefit of producing a single score for each offering, as <br /> opposed to several different scores that may appear to unreasonably deviate from one another. <br /> All evaluation committee members contribute comments to a general discussion that identifies <br /> both common and divergent viewpoints among group members. The group works to resolve <br /> opposing viewpoints by emphasizing common agreement over differences to reach a <br /> consensus on comments. The discussion that takes place before arrival at a consensus score <br /> brings to light the strengths and weaknesses of different solutions. This information is <br /> documented to substantiate scoring. When a consensus cannot be reached, majority <br /> consensus will prevail. <br /> Scoring Process: Identify and record weaknesses, significant weaknesses, deficiencies, <br /> errors, omissions, and other risk factors and how they impact the project to support each <br /> score. <br /> The following consensus determination Points shall be used to rate offerings. <br /> 9-10: Meets or exceeds all requirements. Offering demonstrates complete understanding of the <br /> requirement and offers a substantial chance of success. No deficiencies or weaknesses. <br /> 7-8: Meets all requirements and standards. Offering shows reasonable understanding of the <br /> requirement and offers a high chance of success. No significant deficiencies or weaknesses. <br /> 5-6: Offering indicates a basic understanding of the requirements. There are no substantive <br /> deficiencies and weaknesses. <br /> 3-4: Offering indicates only a marginal understanding of the requirements and offers only a <br /> minimal chance for success. There are significant deficiencies and weaknesses. <br /> 0-2: Offering demonstrates a significant lack of understanding of the requirements. There are <br /> substantial deficiencies and weaknesses. <br /> Technical Scoring Vendor <br /> Name: <br /> % of Points <br /> Criteria total Strengths and/or Weakness <br /> score (0-10) <br /> Scope of Services <br /> • Software functional 50 <br /> requirements <br /> • Training, support and <br /> technical documentation <br />