SU0014290 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

o Includes landscape, hardscape, and street elements that will be designed and constructed in accordance with the adopted MHCSD Design Manual, and will require community approvals regarding specific themes and material variation. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. • This finding can be made since the analysis conducted by CDD has found that the site is physically suitable to accommodate the residential uses proposed. This analysis is based on the improvements proposed and the use of BMPs (Best Management Practices) for storm drainage improvement. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. • This finding can be made since the analysis conducted by CDD has found that the area proposed for development is adequate in size to accommodate the density of development proposed, consistent with the Master Plan and Specific Plan III. 5. Neither the design of the subdivision nor any proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. • This finding can be made because the project site has satisfied the San Joaquin County Multi- Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). The project incorporates all pertinent mitigation measures identified in the Mountain House Master Plan Master EIR, and the CEQA evaluation did not find any additional potentially significant impacts. 6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvement is not likely to cause significant public health problems. • This finding can be made since CDD has concluded that the design of the subdivisions, as conditioned, would either have no impact or less than significant impact on the health of future residents. Additionally, pursuant to Government Code Section 15182, this project Is exempt from CEQA because it is a residential project undertaken pursuant to and in conformity to a specific plan for which an EIR was previously prepared. 7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. • The MHCSD has conducted a consistency review and has determined that the proposed subdivision, as conditioned by the MHCSD, is consistent with MHCSD adopted plans and programs.All easements have been evaluated by the respective agencies and the designs of this subdivision respect the recorded easements of record. Special conditions of the entitlement have been required to respect the concerns of PG&E. 8. Any land or improvement to be dedicated to a public agency is consistent with the General Plan, the Master Plan, any applicable Specific Plan, any applicable Special Purpose Plan, and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. • This finding can be made since the lands or improvements to be dedicated to the MHCSD are consistent with the Public Land Equity Program and/or required to meet the MHCSD Design Manual, both of which are implementation measures for the General Plan, Master Plan, and Specific Plan III. 9. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, as required by Government Code 66473.1. PA-2100120— Findings 2