My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014455
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREWERT
>
212
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2100228
>
SU0014455
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2025 7:35:14 AM
Creation date
11/2/2021 10:16:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014455
STREET_NUMBER
212
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FREWERT
STREET_TYPE
RD
APN
19123011, 12, 14
CURRENT_STATUS
In Review
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
212 W FREWERT RD
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i=rewert Traffic Impact Study <br /> 2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY <br /> Traffic impacts related to the proposed project were evaluated for both compliance with applicable <br /> regulatory documents and environmental significance as defined in the California Environmental Quality <br /> Act(CEQA).The CEQA analysis was conducted in accordance with the CEQA Transportation Analysis <br /> Guidelines finalized in September 2020 by San Joaquin County.As of July 1, 2020, intersection level of <br /> service (LOS) can no longer be used to determine significant CEQA impacts. However, a local traffic impact <br /> study was conducted to determine consistency with San Joaquin County plans and standards. This non- <br /> CEQA analysis was conducted based on the Traffic Impact Study Guidelines for San Joaquin County, dated <br /> November 2008, as updated. <br /> 2.1 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED <br /> This study evaluates project-related VMT as outlined in the adopted San Joaquin County VMT <br /> methodology, as outlined in the CEQA Transportation Analysis Guidelines. <br /> The Governors Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory(December 2018) provides <br /> guidance to analysts and local jurisdictions for implementing VMT as a metric for determining the <br /> transportation impact for land use projects.The OPR guidelines state that for analysis purposes, "VMT", <br /> refers to automobile VMT,specifically passenger vehicles and light trucks. Heavy truck traffic is typically <br /> excluded. <br /> The County guidelines include a screening process that describes scenarios in which a project would be <br /> exempted from a VMT analysis requirement, including screening by project type and maps identifying low- <br /> VMT areas. Since the screening criteria mentioned above do not apply to this project, a qualitative VMT <br /> analysis was prepared. <br /> 2.2 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY <br /> Although Level of Service (LOS) is no longer relevant to CEQA, LOS can be used to determine conformity <br /> with an adopted general plan or congestion management program. LOS is a qualitative measure that <br /> describes operational conditions as they relate to the traffic stream and perceptions by motorists and <br /> passengers.The LOS generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel <br /> time, delays,freedom to maneuver,traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. The operational <br /> LOS are given letter designations from A to F,with A representing the best operating conditions (free- <br /> flow) and F the worst(severely congested flow with high delays). Intersections generally are the capacity- <br /> controlling locations with respect to traffic operations on arterial and collector streets in urban areas. <br /> Signalized intersections <br /> The study intersections under traffic signal control were analyzed using the 6th Edition Highway Capacity <br /> Manual (NCM) Operations Methodology for signalized intersections described in Chapter 18(HCM W1 <br /> Ed.).This methodology determines LOS based on average control delay per vehicle for the overall <br /> intersection during peak hour intersection operating conditions. Control delay includes initial deceleration <br /> delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay.The average control delay for <br /> Page 18 <br /> TJKM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.