My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014502
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST
>
11000
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1900240
>
SU0014502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2022 10:29:54 AM
Creation date
11/4/2021 4:18:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014502
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1900240
STREET_NUMBER
11000
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WEST
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95242-
APN
05908029, -07 -30
ENTERED_DATE
11/4/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
11000 N WEST LN
RECEIVED_DATE
5/2/2022 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
464
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report <br /> Gill Medical Center Project <br /> Worksheets and output reports for the calculation of LOS and vehicles queues for all scenarios analyzed in <br /> the Traffic Study are presented in the Traffic Technical Appendix (See Draft EIR Appendix J). <br /> For two-way stop-sign controlled unsignalized intersections (or one-way stop-sign controlled "T" <br /> intersections), the Highway Capacity Manual method considers gap acceptance and average delay of <br /> motorists on minor streets and in turn lanes to establish LOS. Level of Service is based on the length of <br /> the delay experienced by motorists on the worst single approach, rather than the intersection as a whole. <br /> It should be noted that overall intersection average LOS at unsignalized intersections is better, often much <br /> better, than LOS on the worst single approach. <br /> Signal Warrants Procedures <br /> Traffic signal warrants are a series of standards which provide guidelines for determining if a traffic signal <br /> is appropriate. Signal warrant analyses are typically conducted at intersections of uncontrolled major <br /> streets and stop sign-controlled minor streets. If one or more signal warrants are met, signalization of the <br /> intersection may be appropriate. However, a signal should not be installed if none of the warrants are <br /> met, because installation of signals would increase delays on the previously-uncontrolled major street, <br /> resulting in an undesirable increase in overall vehicle delay at the intersection. Signalization may also <br /> increase the occurrence of certain types of accidents. Therefore, if signals are installed where signal <br /> warrants are not met, the detriment of increased accidents and overall delay may be greater than the <br /> benefit in traffic operating conditions on the single worst movement at the intersection. Signal warrants, <br /> then, provide an industry-standard basis for identifying when the adverse effect on the worst movement is <br /> substantial enough to warrant signalization. <br /> For the analysis conducted for this draft EIR, available data at unsignalized intersections are limited to a.m. <br /> and p.m. peak hour volumes. Thus, unsignalized intersections were evaluated using the Peak Hour <br /> Warrant (Warrant Number 3) from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) document <br /> California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Caltrans 2014). This warrant was applied where the <br /> minor street experiences long delays in entering or crossing the major street for at least one hour of the <br /> day. The Peak Hour Warrant itself includes several components. Some of the components involve <br /> comparison of traffic volumes and vehicle delay to a series of standards. Another component involves <br /> comparison of traffic volumes to a nomograph. <br /> Even if the peak hour warrant is met, a more detailed signal warrant study is recommended before a <br /> signal is installed. The more detailed study should consider volumes during the eight highest hours of the <br /> day, volumes during the four highest hours of the day, pedestrian traffic, and accident histories. <br /> Signal warrant analysis worksheets for all stop sign-controlled intersections are presented in the Traffic <br /> Technical Appendix (see Draft EIR Appendix J). <br /> Roadway Segment Level of Service Analysis Procedures <br /> Roadway segment LOS was analyzed in the Traffic Study based on methods used in the Envision Stockton <br /> 2040 General Plan Update and Utility Master Plan Supplements Draft EIR analysis (City of Stockton 2018c). <br /> These methods set maximum daily traffic volume thresholds for each LOS designation. The thresholds are <br /> shown in Table 4.19-2. <br /> Transportation 4.19-22 October 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.