Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment C <br />Recommendations for Smith Canal Test Pile Work Plan <br />Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 <br />Project: Smith Canal Floodwall, Stockton, California <br />To: Dave C. Carr— KSN Inc. <br />From: Garrett Harris, P.E., G.E. <br />In an effort to support construction estimations and development of approach, HDR has been asked to <br />provide input for a work plan for a field test program specific to the installation of sheet piles. The goal <br />of the test program is to determine the drivability of the proposed project sheet pile sections. <br />HDR recommends that the test program should include explorations to verify the subsurface and <br />drivability conditions within the project foundation boundaries at a test location and for subsequent <br />correlations along the project alignment. <br />Explorations <br />The use of a Cone Penetration Tests (CPTs) rig should be used to obtain soil behavior characteristics at <br />sheet pile test locations along the floodwall alignment. More specifically, HDR recommends between <br />five and seven CPTs total be spread relatively evenly along the floodwall alignment and within the gate <br />structure foot print. This includes a couple of CPT locations and sheet pile test locations of at least one <br />CPT being performed with 5 -feet of a sheet pile test location. CPTs should be advanced to at least an <br />elevation of - 80 feet or to refusal, whichever occurs first. CPTs should be performed in accordance with <br />ASTM D 5778-12 using a 15cm cone probe. It is HDRs understanding that the test program will be <br />confined to the water area of the project, therefore, CPTs will likely be performed from a barge. Figure 1 <br />illustrates proposed CPT locations with associated test sheet pile locations. <br />Sheet Pile installation <br />HDR recommends that the contractor use AS 500 12.7 sheet piles or a sheet pile with equivalent <br />structural properties for a test program. Furthermore, the contractor should be prepared to advance <br />sheet piles to design tip elevation of - 70 feet or refusal, whichever occurs first. It is our understanding <br />that the sheet piles will be advanced with a vibratory hammer. Refusal criteria for advancement as <br />stated in the current version of the project specifications is 12 -inches per minute using a vibratory <br />hammer. Should the contractor determine that the vibratory hammer is inadequate, it is recommended <br />that a diesel hammer be considered for advancing the three test sheet piles. The size of the hammers to <br />be used during the test program should be as close as possible to the hammer that is anticipated to be <br />used during production. <br />