Laserfiche WebLink
1-7 <br />1.3.3 Average Load Capacity Next Five Years <br />The projected average annual load will be market-driven and depends on the availability of <br />feedstock for the composting operation and for use of the product. Currently, it is thought <br />that the average load capacity will be less than the maximum throughput of 1,100 tpd. It <br />should be noted that the annual operation capacity is estimated to range from 332,000 to <br />572,000 cubic yards (14 CCR, Section 18227(h)). <br />1.3.4 Design Capacity <br />As previously discussed, the Compost Facility is designed to process approximately 640 to <br />1,100 tpd. The specific capacity depends on the composting process being used, density of <br />materials and quality of the composted product. The facility was designed to have sufficient <br />area for receiving, preprocessing, composting, curing, and storing these incoming materials <br />as well as residue. Detailed design calculations are included in Appendix B. <br />1.3.5 Feedstock Material Types <br />The feedstock materials as allowed under WDR Order No. R5 -2014-0006 may include, but <br />not be limited to green material, green material mixed with food waste, food waste <br />(inc l uding garbage), food processing residue, sewage sludge, biosolids, mix ed solid waste , <br />manure, mixed paper, ash, gri t/grease (a nimal based), holding t an l ~ pump i ngs, cannery <br />rinse water, and agricultural waste, as described in 14 CCR, Section 17852. All incoming <br />feedstock will be spread out for manual screening in the manual screening area (see Figure <br />2) before being stockpiled. Composition of the material is dependent on the source of the <br />feedstock and time of year. Biosolids may be raw , aerobica ll y digested, or anaerob ically <br />digested and ..... il l be dewatered to 15 to 50 percent dry so li ds. Preprocessing before <br />composting will be completed as needed to produce a product suitable for the final use. <br />Section 1.3 provides a detailed definition of all of the feedstock materials to be utilized at <br />the Compost Facility. <br />1.4 Types and Numbers of Vehicles AntiCipated to Enter the Facility <br />The remote, rural location of the site already minimizes any interference and safety <br />problems for traffic on the adjacent Austin Road. Stacking of vehicles from the <br />RRF/Compost Facility on Austin Road has not and will continue to not occur, nor wil l <br />incoming or outgoing vehicles be allowed to park or idle along Austin Road. In addition, stop <br />signs are posted at RRF/Compost Facility exit to control the flow of traffic. The combined <br />Forward Landfill, RRF, and Compost Facility are expected to receive a maximum of 620 trips <br />as discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) dated December 2002 from <br />which Land Use Permit No. UP-00-07 was issued and as specified in SWFP No. 39-AA-0020 <br />(see Appendix A). Trucks entering the RRF/Compost Facility are directed to the appropriate <br />feedstock unloading area or the RRF building. These traffic measures control the traffic flow <br />into, on, and out of the RRF/Compost Facility in a safe manner as required by 14 CCR, <br />Section 17867(a)(6). <br />Forward Composting Facility SWT Engineering <br />Report of Com posting Site Information -Mayluly 2014 <br />z:\jJrojects \allied waste \forward \resource recovery fac illty \5 yr perm it rvw 20i3-i4\rcsi 20i4\text \se c i.doc