Laserfiche WebLink
Consolidated Forward h,_. Landfill Pagel <br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br />BACKGROUND <br />Assembly Bill 3180 became law in California in January 1, 1989. Tills bill requires all public <br />agencies to adopt monitoring or reporting programs when they approve projects subject to <br />Environmental Impact Reports (ElRs) or Negative Declarations that identify significant irn.pacts. <br />The reporting or monitoring program must be adopted when a public agency makes its findings <br />under Ute California Environmental Quality act (CEQA) so that the program can be made a <br />condition of project approval in order to mitigate significant effects on the environment. The <br />program must be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation to mitigate or <br />avoid significant environmental effects. <br />This MMRP lists mitigation measures identified in this EIR, as well as three previous ElRs prepared for <br />the project site. The three previous ElRs are: <br />1. County of San Joaquin, Community Development Department, Final Environmental <br />Impact Report for Ute Forward, Inc. Landfill Use Permit Modifications, County ~o. ER- <br />92-4, SCH No. 92032013, prepared by LSA Associates, Inc., March 2, 1993 (identified as <br />"Forward 1993" below). <br />2. City of Stockton, Public Works Department, Final Environmental Impact Report: City <br />of Stockton Austin Road Landfill Expansion Project, SCH No. 90020178, prepared by <br />Environmental Science Associates, June 1994 Odentified as "Austin 1994" below). <br />3. County of San Joaquin, Community Development Department, Final Supplemental <br />Environmental Impact Report Austin Road Landfill Expansion Project, SCH No. <br />90020718, prepared by Grassetti Environmental Consulting, January 2000 (identified as <br />"Austin 2000" below). <br />This MMRP includes both a complete listing of all required mitigation measures, and a table descnlJiog <br />who is responsible for monitoring the implementation of those measures,and bow that monitoring shaH <br />be implemented. <br />Mitigation measures are grouped by the impact categories used in this EIR, and numbered sequentially. <br />Mitigation Measures from this EIR are printed in normal font, and identified as either "Measures <br />Proposed as Part of the Project" or "Identified in This EIR", with the original Mitigation Measure <br />numbers from this EIR following in (parentheses). Mitigation measures from the three previous E1Rs are <br />printed in italics and identified by their source (Forward 1993, Austin 1994, or Austin 2000, as defined <br />above), followed by the Mitigation Measure number from thereleYllllt EIR. Because some impacts in this <br />EIR and previous EIRS do not require mitigation measures, the original mitigation measure numbers are <br />not sequential. <br />In some cases, mitigation measures from two or more of the previous ElRs that are substantially similar <br />in content, or have been updated without othenvise being changed, have been combined. These <br />mitigation measures are identified as "similar" andlor "updated". Mitigation measures from the three <br />previous EIRs that have been replaced by equivalent measures in this EIR, or have already been <br />implemented, are excluded from the list below. <br />. ----~-'---~--,-