My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1990-1993
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1990-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2022 9:54:18 AM
Creation date
12/20/2021 11:44:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1990-1993
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.st <br />February 8, 1990 <br />California Integrated <br />Waste Management Board <br />1020 Ninth Street, Suite 300 <br />Sacramento, California 95814 <br />Re: Compliance Agreement for Foothill Sanitary <br />Landfill, Facility No. 39 -AA -004 - Your letter <br />of January 10, 1990 <br />COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT <br />Violation 18211 - Application for Revision of a Permit <br />As set forth in the compliance agreement which you <br />received on November 9, 1989, we set forth the following: <br />"This site has always been permitted to receive <br />infectious waste with the approval of the Local Health <br />District and has in fact been receiving such waste for <br />many years. We fail to see how continuation could <br />constitute a significant change in the design or <br />operation of the facility. See attached October 12, <br />1989 letter from the Public Health Services Department <br />of the County of San Joaquin for further explanation." <br />Copy also attached hereto. <br />Although both the operator and Local Enforcement Agency <br />are in accord on the facts, your letter states, "A review of <br />Board files indicates no evidence or correspondence related <br />to this issue." Based on your files, you have apparently <br />concluded that the applicant and Local Enforcement Agency <br />are not correct. <br />We do not agree with your determination that a signifi- <br />cant change in facility operations has occurred and hereby <br />appeal the same. Please advise as to when we might be given <br />a hearing on this matter. Our expectation is to present <br />witnesses from both the Public Health Services Department <br />and the operator who will testify under oath as to the <br />alleged facts. This testimony will include approval by the <br />State. <br />We do not feel that a revision of the SWFP is required <br />in that it was intended to be included and the SWFP has <br />always been treated as including the same. The operation <br />plan which has been in use was approved by the Local <br />Enforcement Agency. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.