Laserfiche WebLink
AA <br /> } Monitoring Report Compliance ChOlist <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> RWQCB <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A Reviewer Comment <br /> WDRs / Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Standard <br /> Provisions 1. Are all groundwater Field Parameters X <br /> (Sept 93/Aug 97) Monitoring Parameter,and COCs <br /> (if required)sampled and analyzed? <br /> in. Have any groundwater concentration X Turbidity in MW-3 exceeded CL <br /> limits been exceeded? If yes,identify in MW-l. Phenol estimated in <br /> in comments. <br /> MW-2. <br /> n. Is there a description and graphical X <br /> presentation of groundwater flow <br /> direction and gradient? <br /> o. Monitoring Wells: Is there a X <br /> description,method,and time <br /> of water level measurement and <br /> well recovery time? <br /> p. Purging: Is there a description X Dedicated purge and sample <br /> of the purging method,purge pumps. Problems purging MW- <br /> pump and its placement, and 2, insufficient recovery for <br /> field parameters? needed sample volume. <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> County will continue monitoring turbidity in MW-3. <br /> Methylene chloride trace in MW-2, also in Lab blank. Phenol trace at MW-2; estimated value. County did <br /> not resample in the First Quarter 2000. <br /> Sampled MW-1 and MW-3 on 10/21,however MW-2 was sampled on 11/3 after attempts to sample on <br /> 10/21 and 10/26. <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: <br /> Date: <br />