Laserfiche WebLink
Monitoring Report Compliance Checklist <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> RWQCB <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A Reviewer Comment <br /> WDRs/MRP/ Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Standard <br /> Provisions 1. Are all groundwater Field Parameters X <br /> (Sept 93/Aug 97) Monitoring Parameter,and COCs <br /> (if required) sampled and analyzed? <br /> in. Have any groundwater concentration X MW-3 with trace VOCs. <br /> limits been exceeded? If yes, identify Upgradient well MW-1 had <br /> in comments. <br /> acetone and chloroform reported. <br /> n. Is there a description and graphical X <br /> presentation of groundwater flow <br /> direction and gradient? <br /> o. Monitoring Wells: Is there a X <br /> description,method, and time <br /> of water level measurement and <br /> well recovery time? <br /> p. Purging: Is there a description X Ensure that field parameters are <br /> of the purging method,purge stabilized during the purge. <br /> pump and its placement, and <br /> field parameters? <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> County ordered a retest for VOCs (TCE and 1,1-DCE) in MW-3. Retest results were received on 8/1 and <br /> confirmed the presence of the VOCs at concentrations below the PQL. <br /> Ensure field consultant samples wells after the field parameters stabilize. <br /> Possible LFG odors noted. There is not an increasing trend for the chloride in MW-3, and the low levels <br /> may be indicative of LFG. The County is designing a control system. <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: - W ate-,e <br /> Date: 0 OZ) <br />