Laserfiche WebLink
Monitoring Report Compliance Checklist 14 <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A Reviewer Comment <br /> WDRs u. Is there a summary of the monitoring <br /> Standard results indicating any changes made <br /> Provisions or observed since the previous annual <br /> (1993,1997,2000) report? <br /> v. Is there an evaluation of the <br /> effectiveness of the leachate <br /> monitoring/control facilities? <br /> Standard w. Is there a discussion about the <br /> Provisions annual LCRS testing and a <br /> (April 2000) comparison to earlier testing? <br /> or check WDRs <br /> Violations Noted? (check one) Yes No x <br /> If Yes, check all issues that apply and provide comments: <br /> Incomplete transmittal letter Comments (to be entered into SWIM): <br /> Incomplete report <br /> Inadequate monitoring program <br /> New release <br /> Inadequate response to evidence of a release <br /> WDRs violation other than listed above <br /> Other(explain in comments) <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> MW-3 = 1,4-Dichlorobenzene at 0.18 pg/l,tetrachloroethene at 0.086 gg/l,trichlorethene at 0.065 gg/l. An <br /> Evaluation Monitoring Program was submitted May 2001. To be reviewed by Board staff. <br /> Increasing trend of sulfate in MW-2 and MW-3. <br /> EPA Method 7199(ion chromatography) should be used instead of EPA Method 7196 (colorimetric) for hexavalent <br /> chromium. <br /> There is no signature on the Standard Observations form. <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: <br /> Date: 31 January 2002 <br />