Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> Monitoring Report Compliance Checklist 4 <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A RWQCB <br /> Reviewer Comment <br /> WDRs u. Is there a summary of the X No evaluation of soil pore gas monitoring <br /> Standard monitoring results indicating any results or graphs. <br /> Provisions changes made or observed since <br /> (1993,1997,2000, the previous annual report? <br /> 2003) <br /> v. Is there an evaluation of the X <br /> effectiveness of the leachate <br /> monitoring/control facilities? <br /> Standard w. Is there a discussion about the X <br /> Provisions annual LCRS testing and a <br /> (April 2000, comparison to earlier testing? <br /> Sept. 2003)or <br /> check WDRs <br /> Compliance achieved? (check one) Yes No_X <br /> If No, check all issues that apply and provide comments: <br /> Comments (to be entered into CIWOS/Geotracker): <br /> Incomplete transmittal letter <br /> _X_Incomplete report Discharger has failed to provide the required graphs <br /> Inadequate monitoring program evaluating soil pore gas; Discharger failed to evaluate <br /> New release stiff diagrams as required, or include the appropriate <br /> Inadequate response to evidence of a release field data sheets for wells MW-I through MW-3. <br /> X WDRs violation other than listed above <br /> Other(explain in comments) <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> 21. - Discharger has not provided graphs of soil pore gas monitoring parameters showing historical trends at each monitoring point <br /> as required by MRP R5-2003-0020. <br /> 2.p. - Report did not include monitoring well MW-1 through MW-3 field data sheets describing disposition of purge water, <br /> calculated volumes removed,or well recovery times. <br /> 2.q. - Report did not evaluate stiff diagrams as required in MRP R5-2003-0020. <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: <br /> Date: c- � <br /> i <br />