Laserfiche WebLink
.:ri.�°` .�s.,�. ,1r.*�; ` -:�x '�; ;�_..y.�:ti►'�i e's� �.�. •u :.'y.-eY.a ,;�:,aL:' :�!!7 i`.,��Ci- � �•'�;,,,s,,�d„=.�����;�"w. <br />control, not flood control but storm drainage and water, etc. and <br />so on. I think it would be most appropriate. This area is cut <br />UT). There is.no question about it it's cut up, it's done, it's <br />over with, it has its natural boundaries of the four roads and <br />-the internal roads already. There is a railroad track through <br />there, and an irrigation ditch that goes through there. It is <br />most difficult to say. It is prize land, but it's not prime <br />agricultural economic farming. I don't know if there is a <br />possible way that the board could. I don't think there is: We <br />have not been confronted with this before, as to having a staging <br />area or a phasing area of possible outward growth of rural <br />residential. Z would have to unfortunately support the GAIO at <br />this time, I think it's more appropriate than GA40 by a long shot. <br />GA40 would be absolutely ridiculous. Therefore, it would be <br />absolutely ridiculous and not even come close to what the area <br />is. r,A10 is a sort of a holding area as far as possible growth <br />and development and I think that in another year or so as the area <br />of '_yaurland and Valpico has gone, it has infilled, that we can <br />again look at it as far as rezoning or redesignating part of that <br />area as rural residential as the need arises. It would be most <br />difficult for us to do that today. <br />There'd be opposition not only from the city, but there'd <br />b6 other opposition being looked at from other authorities. So <br />as much as I wish I could refer back to the Planning Commission, <br />I wish that we could stage it or rephrase it so part of it would <br />be rural residential and that is impossible at this time but I <br />would like the board to keep back in their mind that in another <br />year or so we could reconsider this parcel redesignation. I don't <br />~ know if we can make that part of any motion or anything like that, <br />but if we can make it part of record, I wish to have that part <br />of record. I would request that in a year or two years, a minimum <br />of one year, that it be reconsidered for a general plan change <br />designation. 1980 would be the 5 -year term of the administrative <br />1-6 <br />M <br />